Friday 13 December 2013
Summary | ||
The Prosecution Case Continues | ||
Back at the Hacking Trial | ||
Counsel for Andy Coulson examines hacking of Rav Singh | ||
Witness – Operation Weeting Detective DC Massey | ||
Counsel for Andy Coulson cross examines DC Massey | ||
Witness – Operation Weeting Detective DC Guest | ||
Prosecution Counsel questions DC Guest | ||
Counsel for Rebekah Brooks Objection | ||
Saunders directs the Jury on Social Media | ||
Counsel for Rebekah Brooks refers to Nick Brown Christmas Card | ||
Witness – Operation Weeting Detective DC Oskiewicz | ||
Prosecution Counsel questions DC Oskiewicz |
The Prosecution Case Continues | ||
Back at the Hacking Trial | ||
Long overdue chat with my dear son in Australia means I’ll be about 10 mins late to #hackingtrial apologies. Blame time zones | ||
Counsel for Andy Coulson examines hacking of Rav Singh | ||
Back at #hackingtrial where Langdale, counsel for Coulson, exploring hacking of Rav Singh, a NOTW journalist, involved in Calum Best story | ||
The hacks of Rav Singh took place several times in the March of that year (2005?) when the Calum Best story was current | ||
The hacks of Rav SIngh by Mulcaire seem to have taken place around the funeral of Calum’s father, George Best #hackingtrial | ||
All these Calum Best and Rav Singh hacks refer to March 2006 | ||
Langdale brings up April 26th email with Coulson complaining NOTWs lack of kiss and tell stories and Calum Best “scraping bottom of barrel” | ||
11/05/06 email from Andy Coleman to Kuttner submits 799 calls from Rav Singh in the month before | ||
Call records show Rav Singh calling and texting Calum Best‘s agent – Adee Phelan about ten times in May 06 | ||
Email from Chris Tate on 20/05/06 on Lorna Hogan’s text to Calum Best about her pregnancy, and fearing leak within NOTW | ||
On previous email, Langdale says he will be “coming back to the issue of non disclosure of that email to the defense later” | ||
Langdale goes back to the “Do his phone” Coulson email, and then cites four subsequent articles in NOTW over the next year | ||
Witness – Operation Weeting Detective DC Massey | ||
Counsel for Andy Coulson cross examines DC Massey | ||
Langdale asks about the “failure of the police… to disclose the leak email about what Lorna Hogan was saying to Chris Tate” | ||
Langdale is cross examining DC Massey from the Operation Weeting about the extraction of emails from NI NOMAD files | ||
Langdale makes the point that there’s no evidence Calum Best was targeted as a result of the Coulson “Do his phone” email | ||
Langdale says that in April 13 pretrial submissions “Do his phone” was said to be a request for checking on the billing in case of NOTW leak | ||
BREAKING: Langdale, for Coulson, claims the “Do his phone” email about Calum Best is a request for billing info about Rav Singh’s phone | ||
Rav Singh, DC Massey explains, is being investigated in regards to hacking under Operation Pinetree, which relates to NOTW features desk. | ||
Langdale takes DC Massey back to a hard drive which had been overlooked by police until July 2013. On that drive was a Coulson PST file | ||
Langdale explains how individual defendants got copies of their old PST (email) files recovered from a hard drive iin July 2013 | ||
DC Massey explains how they searched this new data using key words, looking for anything that could assist prosecution or defence | ||
DC Massey explains that one of the key words in the search of this new material was the word “Calum” | ||
The police search in July this year of the new material didn’t pick up the “scraping the barrel” email mentioning ‘calum’ | ||
Langdale asks DC Massey: “How come you missed that?” Massey: “I can only apologise it seems to have been missed.” | ||
Langdale: “How could you have missed it? It was obviously relevant.” DC Massey: “The fact remains quite palpably it was missed, I apologise” | ||
Saunders and Langdale agree they weren’t involved in the case during this period – neither defence nor prosecution saw it in early July | ||
Langdale says to DC Massey “the seriousness of the failure to find this document is highlighted later” and goes to a 23/10/12 report | ||
An October 13 review by DC Ryall in October found about 110 new relevant emails in these various mail files for several NOTW employees | ||
Langdale says trial was opened on the basis that “Do his phone” meant hacking, and this new info only provided morning of Best’s appearance | ||
“Nobody drew the defence’s attention to the fact there was evidence related to Calum Best, due that very day,” says Langdale | ||
“It was only as Calum best was leaving the stand that the defense were given a password to that disk from the prosecution,” says Langdale | ||
“It was only because [not named for legal reasons] team provided that email to me I could put that email to Calum Best,” says Langdale | ||
Bryant Heron adds an amended Milly Dowler timeline into the jury bundle | ||
The Dubai timing of calls between Brooks and Coulson has been amended in this new timeline | ||
Half an hour break while new schedules are installed | ||
Back with #hackingtrial on a slightly stop-start morning: Saunders gives the “program of the day” – schedules and Kuttner interviews | ||
Witness – Operation Weeting Detective DC Guest | ||
Prosecution Counsel questions DC Guest | ||
Chalkley for the crown produces some new schedules for the jury: DC Guest is here to help her with the Dowler and other timelines | ||
Chalkley explains that the calls between Coulson in London and Brooks in Dubai in April 2002 were on three hour time difference – Dubai +3 | ||
So the prosecution are creating a new timeline when all these Brooks/Coulson calls and texts are in UK time, rather than a mix of Dubai/UK | ||
Chalkley gives the jury an “Overall Chronology” of phone hacking related to the defendants. #hackingtrial | ||
Chalkley explains how the overall chronology cross refers to either a timeline, an incident, or an “agreed fact” by both sides | ||
Jury shown an memo 09/10/99 from Kuttner to Miskiw on news desk on surveillance costs at £167k cc’ed to Phil Hall (then editor) and Goodman | ||
This overall chronology fits in all the various counts involved in the #hackingtrial from the moment Brooks and Coulson rejoined in 2000 | ||
Jury shown again the Evening Standard article about Greg Miskiw being recalled from NYC to set up investigations unit for NOTW in 2000 | ||
The prosecution is essentially cross referencing much of the evidence we’ve already heard into one chronology: no point reiterating here | ||
In March 2006 Greg Miskiw started his Miles Ahead company and made two payments to Mulcaire | ||
Counsel for Rebekah Brooks Objection | ||
Counsel for Brooks objects about a timeline reference to a PCC letter drafted in Brooks’ name: it was never actually sent by her | ||
On the same day in Jan 11 three emails are sent to police to start Operation Weeting NI attempt to delete all their emails for last 10 years | ||
Bettina Jordan-Barber paid by Sun until early 2012 despite arrests of several senior NI executives suspected of payments to public officials | ||
“@DBanksy: December #Medialaw bulletin out now, it’s free, to subscribe, click here – http://davidbanksmedialaw.wordpress.com/bulletin/ ” <<< highly recommended | ||
Saunders reminds the jury to ignore social media “in fairly strong terms… not to be influenced by anything outside court” | ||
Saunders directs the Jury on Social Media | ||
Saunder is warning the jury now “there are things on twitter trending that are deeply prejudicial to Mrs Brooks” | ||
Counsel for Rebekah Brooks refers to Nick Brown Christmas Card | ||
“It is a problem other courts have experienced….” Laidlaw for Brooks wants to show the jury the prejudicial Christmas Card from Nick Brown | ||
Laidlaw inadvertently called Nick Brown Nick Davies: he meant former Labour chief whip | ||
BREAKING: Jury shown prejudicial Christmas Card by Laidlaw: Saunders: “I’m well aware this could increase the circulation of this…” | ||
Witness – Operation Weeting Detective DC Oskiewicz | ||
Prosecution Counsel questions DC Oskiewicz | ||
Bryant Heron for crown explains they have to some “schedule gardening” replacing out of date schedules | ||
FYI: no one can find mention of this Brown Christmas card trending and independent article has only 92 retweets at this time | ||
Bryant Heron explains 8,000 notes were recovered from Mulcaire’s household – notebooks, loose leaf sheets, diaries. | ||
DC Oskiewicz explains the four names in the top left of Mulcaire’s notes were news desk editors at NOTW have been put in chronological order | ||
The current schedule is therefore as summary of what the prosecution call those “Top Left Notes” – some when Brooks was editor NOTW | ||
Bryant Heron explains that the first four “top-left notes” are dated in 1999 – predating Brooks’ arrival in 2000; the next is 8th Jan 2001 | ||
There are about twenty pages of entries covering the three years Brooks was editor of NOTW until Jan 2003 | ||
The second schedule is the Mulcaire “top left notes” during Coulson’s editorship of NOTW from 2003 to Jan 2007. | ||
We’re now looking at construction of first schedule: Mulcaire top left notes for 1999-2003. | ||
Only Neville and Miskiw feature as Mulcaire “tasked by” news editors during the period of Brooks’ editorship of News of the World | ||
Weeting DC explains they included related NOTW stories related to individuals two weeks before or after a ‘tasking’ to Mulcaire | ||
The second schedule covers Mulcaire taskings for the period from 03-6: this now cross refers to call data (noy available for previous 99-03) | ||
Weeting DC explains the methodology police used to date the undated Mulcaire notes: 1. Before and after pages in bound notebooks. | ||
Police methodology on undated Mulcaire notes: 2. Some people of interest to NOTW were quite time specific 3. Two taskings on same page | ||
More on police methodology on undated Mulcaire notes: 4. Some just filed by period of employment of desk eds. 5. Some impossible to date | ||
Bryant Heron for prosecution calls Richard Fitzgerald to go through the methodology of the third schedule – Mulcaire and taskers phone data | ||
On this schedule various lines of Mulcaire are logged, and – when possible – their recipients. Includes Orange Platform Network of time | ||
There are calls to landlines in this Mulcaire schedule which are not hacks, but they do relate to “top left” taskers at NOTW news desk | ||
There are 1184 datacall entries for Mulcaire’s outbound phones in 03-06: break till 2 O’Clock Tuesday. That’s it for #hackingtrial this week | ||
Clive Goodman and Andy Coulson email about purchasing a Royal Phone Directory http://wp.me/p1YHIt-dk |
Note: All the defendants deny all the charges. The trial continues.
Related Articles
Goodman/ Coulson emails: purchasing a Royal Phone Directory and “Turning” Royal Aide’s Phone
Edmondson removed from Current Hacking Trial
The Coulson Calum Best Email: Do His Phone
Media lawyer decribes British media as “an incestuous nest of vipers”: Ambi Sitham at the Hacking Trial
8 Lessons From the Murdoch Phone Hacking Trial
Previous Posts
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 10 Dec
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 11 Dec
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 12 Dec
Links: The Trial So Far | Full Trial Summary | Indexed Evidence | Breaking News
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 17 Dec | Live Tweeting the hacking trial
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 18 Dec | Live Tweeting the hacking trial
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 19 Dec | Live Tweeting the hacking trial