Wednesday 26 February 2014
Summary | ||
Rebekah Brooks Defence Continues on Count 1 – Phone Hacking | ||
Brooks questioned on News of the World exclusives | ||
Brooks asked about Glen Mulcaire | ||
Soham Murders | ||
David Blunkett story | ||
Eimear Cook and the Lunch Meeting | ||
Rebekah Brooks questioned on Arrests of Goodman and Mulcaire | ||
Brooks reaction to the arrest of Clive Goodman | ||
Brooks Phone Hacked | ||
Coulson Resignation | ||
Brooks meeting with Clive Goodman after Prison release |
Rebekah Brooks Defence Continues on Count 1 – Phone Hacking | ||
Brooks questioned on News of the World exclusives | ||
Justice Saunders asks the jury to put their Milly Dowler bundles away. We’ve finished with that part of Brooks’ defence. | ||
Jonathan Laidlaw QC picks up some remaining Count One evidence from Mr Sweet, Blunkett and Eimear Cook at the #hackingtrial | ||
We’re now in June 2002: a budget memo from Kuttner to Brooks is adduced. | ||
Laidlaw is going through the upward revision weekly spending limits at NOTW when Global recession in wake of 9/11 didn’t materialise | ||
Brooks notices the small increase in the editorial budget in financial year 2002-03 | ||
Brooks email cited to Harry Scott and Greg Miskiw 8pm on a Saturday night cited when rival Sundays – particularly MoS – came in. | ||
Two more emails in this chain: one from Bill Akass: the bigger the circulation of a rival Sunday the earlier the edition | ||
Miskiw email to James Morgan in finance about a cheque for Mulcaire: Brooks says she never saw document nor was it brought to her attention | ||
20/07/02 Brooks writing to Harry Scott, copied to Scott and Miskiw, about “matching all the Shipman stuff” and “good stuff in broadsheets” | ||
J Saunders asks about copying from others “matches”: do you just write it up? Brooks “depending on which paper it is you check it first” | ||
A email from Scottish editor of NOTW asking Brooks about PCC is cited at #hackingtrial | ||
Brooks explains Bob Bird is “asking invasion into privacy is justified in public interest… breaching the misconduct rules….” | ||
Brooks replies: “No problem with it providing it’s 100% accurate PCC wise…. No need to go off moral highground.” Bird: “Ok, thanks” | ||
Brooks asks about a redaction from email: Laidlaw says its probably redacted by News International when provided to the police | ||
Email from Coulson copied to Brooks cited: a draft letter about Heather Mills “a pre notification kind of letter” to agent or some sort. | ||
Second contract between NOTW and Euro Research signed by Glenn Mulcaire and Greg Miskiw is analysed. Same clauses as previous years | ||
Brooks “as I said ye…. I can’t remember what day now… the cumulative figure should have been shown to me and Kuttner….” | ||
Brooks contd: “But the way the week payments were made meant it went under the limit” | ||
03/11/02 Brooks email complains about Sunday Mirror getting a picture of Maxine Carr. | ||
“The police have all my diaries and so can check… but it seems odd sending an email on a Tuesday,” says Brooks of 03/11/02 Carr email | ||
Email 20/11/02 from Brooks to heads of dept at NOTW saying “Come on guys” about a blank page 13 | ||
Another email thread 13/09/02 about two policeman involved in Soham case with some allegations of child porn | ||
Brooks on child internet porn forum and chat room: “We have to get into illegal websites…. you have to think about it, justify it” | ||
This email is called “Soham Cops”: Brooks “we may get away with this is website Soham Cops are charged with and so on.” | ||
Brooks “Surely cops so angry at Soham we should be able to get that out of them… maybe Stuart Kuttner can get from Chief Constable” | ||
Brooks is talking about an FBI Operation Org (?) into child porn sites. She explains how Kuttner was “helping or criticising” police. | ||
Brooks added comments to Panther piece: “It was complicated story… She comments on piece “Shouldn’t we tell the police where he is then.” | ||
“It needs a lot of work. It all seems so strange. Need to explain why he’s talking to us about court cases,” says Brooks email on Panther | ||
19/09/02 email from Brooks saying Milly Dowler‘s body found: Brooks “he’s getting it from Daily Mail… so I don’t know if it’s right” | ||
20/09/02 Brooks writes to a number of people for night conference; “information in respect of Milly” | ||
“I had a lot of questions from the morning conference,” says Brooks about follow up email on Friday: “It’s just normal” | ||
12/10/02 – we’re approaching the end of Brooks’ editorship – “matter of pride we get a picture of this woman Nadia mustn’t be beaten by MoS” | ||
Brooks writes to Miskiw and Thurlbeck: “want a thorough readover of the Sunday Mirror”. Brooks explains she’d get S Mirror a bit earlier | ||
“It was possible to go to Kings Cross where the street editions… possible to get a friendly delivery driver” says Brooks of early copies | ||
NOTW email from Brooks late 2002 explaining how it seen off threats from rivals and “stopped the MoS in its tracks” | ||
The email praises Neville Thurlbeck and Mazer Mahmoud among others for setting the agenda with their exclusives in 2002. | ||
Brooks invites them all for champagne in her office for this Xmas 2002 email to NOTW staff | ||
Memo from Brooks to Les Hinton around Xmas 2002 is cited by Laidlaw | ||
Brooks: “the whole document is me asking for more marketing, a price cut, and outlining the case for it…. comparing it to Saturday Sun” | ||
Brooks: “was told very early in the morning I had to met Les for breakfast, I was told 5 in the morning I was going to be editor of the Sun” | ||
Brooks says she thinks she didn’t actually start till the next day at the Sun. | ||
Brooks asked about Glen Mulcaire | ||
Laidlaw asks about Geoff Sweet’s evidence given previously at #hackingtrial | ||
Geoff Sweet had previously spoken about 18/08/02 article in NOTW which mentioned Mulcaire and previous footballing prowess | ||
Geoff Sweet had previously told jury, in Laidlaw’s words, “it was known at the office Glenn Mulcaire worked for the News of the World” | ||
Laidlaw points out this Geoff Sweet article was on p 82, and the mention of ‘Trigger’ being part of our “special investigations team” | ||
“I don’t remember that,” says Brooks of Mulcaire article in NOTW. “I first heard of him in 2006…. there were 18 pages of sport that day.” | ||
“The only unit you could say existed was Mazer Mahmoud’s Fake Sheikh operation, but it had lots of people in it.” says Brooks. “3 to 4” | ||
Brooks: “I know one of them I think. He used to appear as the Fake Sheikh’s assistant” Saunders: “It was all too secret for you to know” | ||
Brooks says of Sweet: “Most sports reporters didn’t sit in the office… getting to know managers and players.” Sport had big production | ||
“Occasionally they’d come in just to do their expenses,” says Brooks of Sports Reporters | ||
Soham Murders | ||
Brooks is asked about her whereabouts during Soham story on 18/08/02 “though it may be particularly difficult for you” | ||
11/08/02 two girls gone missing in Soham – search for them. | ||
Brooks remembers flying home for the investigation of the Soham missing girl: “it wasn’t like with Sarah Payne”. | ||
A joint reward is offered by Sun and NOTW: Sara Payne writes article. NOTW retrace steps of Holly and Jessica in Soham | ||
NOTW for 18/08/02 has the discovered of the bodies of Jessica and Holly. Brooks was back in office by then. | ||
Brooks explains how there would have been a lot of coverage that would need to be changed when bodies found on Saturday | ||
Brooks explains this edition was an important for the beginning of the football season. “I think there were 50 pages of sport” that weekend | ||
Brooks says she would have focused on stuff discovered in conference “and not just piece by Geoff Sweet on page 82” | ||
“On the 18th we were obviously confident enough to launch Sarah’s Law again…” says Brooks of Soham coverage after bodies discovered | ||
NOTW article with allegations against two Soham policeman cited. Another edition has references to Maxine Carr. | ||
This takes us 20/10/02 and stories about a fellow prisoner on remand with Huntley | ||
David Blunkett story | ||
Laidlaw moves onto David Blunkett in August 2004 | ||
This concerns Andy Coulson‘s visit to Sheffield to see Blunkett and Sun’s relationship with Kimberley Quinn. | ||
NOTW article did not name Quinn as Blunkett’s lover. But the Sun did the next day on its front page. | ||
The following Tuesday in August 04 the Mirror broke the story that Quinn was pregnant: “we matched it from the Mirror” says Brooks. | ||
“It’s suggested,” says Laidlaw, “which looks at patterns of calls between you and Coulson…. NOTW and the Sun working together” | ||
“Producing a story which is the result of a hack made at NOTW,” says Laidlaw of prosecution case on Blunkett. | ||
Laidlaw asks about state or relationship with her and Coulson – the break up unsent love letter written by Brooks in Feb that year | ||
April 2004 NOTW covered a David Beckham story – Brooks and Coulson were rivals. | ||
“As you can tell by reading the letter things weren’t great,” says Brooks of letter. | ||
“The two newspapers were… pretty strong rivals,” says Brooks. “Andy and I had been v good at keeping that Chinese wall” | ||
“Co-operating a bit more on promotions compared to other editors,” says Brooks. “He was on a weekly – I was on a daily” | ||
Brooks talks about being a “hostage to fortune”: “I knew the Beckhams a bit socially… always trying to get Victoria or David to write” | ||
“Andy would have known I had a direct line to David,” says Brooks. On the affair, it would be dangerous to even mention to her | ||
“Things were difficult – it was strange for a while,” says Brooks of rivalry with Coulson. | ||
“Would you have any hesitation in stealing that story?” asks Laidlaw. “Probably not, no,” says Brooks. | ||
“I might be holding the story… to hold it for an interview with David and Victoria… a bit like the Countess of Wessex,” says Brooks. | ||
“Had I known the NOTW were running, I would have run it earlier. It caused unnecessary angst in an already complicated story,” says Brooks | ||
In April 2004 NOTW did a “spoof edition” hiding the splash on David Beckham’s affair. “It was much harder to do,” Brooks says with online | ||
“Holding onto an exclusive became much more difficult in the Sunday market,” says Brooks of 2004 and growing online presence. | ||
“No one at NOTW or Andy had discussed with me,” says Brooks of Beckham affair expose. But Daily Mirror and Mail heard. | ||
“The Mail and the Mirror had a march on us,” says Brooks. “I was not best pleased at that situation” she adds as editor of the Sun. | ||
Brooks speaks of her relationship with Blunkett: she first got to know him when she was at NOTW: “He’d been really good at Sarah’s Law” | ||
“He took the public opinion… and gap with public policy, very seriously,” says Brooks. “We started to work together on campaigns” | ||
“I got to know his special advisers well,” Brooks says of Blunkett 2001. By 2004 “we would have dinner a couple of times a year on our own” | ||
The Sun would sponsor the Police Bravery Awards, Brooks explains, where she’d met chief police officers | ||
Brooks says one of Blunkett’s special advisors became a friend of hers: she’s now married to Les Hinton. | ||
“I introduced them to each other,” says Brooks of Les Hinton and Blunkett’s special advisor | ||
“Things are better,” says Brooks of relationship with Coulson around Aug 04. She says she had no idea that Coulson had a story on Blunkett | ||
BREAKING: Brooks says “absolutely” did not know of the hacking of Blunkett’s voicemails | ||
“Like the Beckham incident,” says Brooks: “I think Andy told me he had the Blunkett story late on Saturday… very late.” | ||
“I don’t know if he did a spoof edition,” says Brooks of NOTW Blunkett sotry. She was told late after “they had made all the decisions” | ||
“As it became more difficult to hold onto exclusive, became the pattern to give big exclusive to news channels on Sat night,” says Brooks | ||
Brooks “best recollection” was that Blunkett story was “out there” and was told on Saturday. “Definitely not” told of source of story. | ||
Brooks on Coulson on Blunkett’s lover: “he must have told me he was not naming her… he might not have known her name” | ||
BREAKING: Brooks says she named Kimberley Quinn as Blunkett’s lover at Sun through a “brief check of cuttings… gossipy items” | ||
“I think in the end it was a simple as me getting one of his special advisers to confirm it,” says Brooks. She names Huw Evans. | ||
“The Home Secretary’s office had not denied it,” says Brooks of Blunkett’s lover. “It was leading the BBC news on the Saturday night” | ||
“I think it was inevitable her name was going to come out,” says Brooks of Quinn | ||
“I heard what Huw said here, ” says Brooks “But I was very friendly with him.” | ||
According to memory Brooks says she said to to Evans: “We’re going to run Kimberly tomorrow… and he didn’t reply.” | ||
17/08/04 The Sun writes about Quinn’s pregnancy only in subsequent editions, by matching the Mirror which had revealed it. | ||
15/08/04 billings from Coulson’s phone are all that are available. “Only half the picture,” says Laidlaw. Brooks’s billings not available. | ||
Three or five calls or texts a day from Coulson to Brooks in early August 2004: “we were definitely speaking every day,” says Brooks | ||
“I think we were back to being very close again… I don’t think my call data would be very different to this,” says Brooks of contact | ||
13/08/04 Coulson makes the trip to Sheffield. Day before “a lot of texts” from Coulson to Brooks. | ||
“My diary says I was was at my girlfriend’s dinner… Judy McGuire,” says of that evening before Coulson’s trip to Blunkett | ||
The texts “every minute” during the night. “My guess would have been these were very personal” says Brooks of texts to Coulson that night | ||
“It would be highly likely I would ask somebody,” says Brooks of Coulson’s trip to see Blunkett. | ||
“I can’t see how he could have told me he was seeing David Blunkett without me being intrigued,” says Brooks of Coulson meeting. | ||
“I was either in London or Oxfordshire that weekend,” Brooks says of the NOTW expose of Blunkett’s lover. | ||
NOTW edition on 15/04/04. “I can’t see now a reason I wouldn’t have called Andy to see if he knew it [the name of Blunkett’s lover] | ||
“Hopefully we’ll be able to recycle everything and turn them into trees again,” says Justice Saunders of mounting bundles at #hackingtrial | ||
Brooks explains that naming Kimberley Quinn: “I think it was our exclusive” at the Sun. | ||
Eimear Cook and the Lunch Meeting | ||
Laidlaw turns to the Eimear Cook evidence heard previously at #hackingtrial | ||
Brooks had attended lunch at the Manoukians and Eimear Cook in 20/09/05 – she was in third year of editorship of Sun | ||
“Yes, they are,” says Brooks of being friends with Manoukians. She had met Joe Manoukian in 2000/01. She’d see them 3 or 4 times a year | ||
“This is a Tuesday,” notes Laidlaw. Brooks confirms it would be unusual to go out for lunch. “Les’ Dining Room” was mostly used at Wapping | ||
Sorry “Jo” Manoukian was Brooks’ first contact. Rafi Manoukian called Brooks about Eimear’s problems “with profile and the media” | ||
Brooks had not met Eimear Montgomery before: “Obviously I’d heard of her… more of interest to Daily Mail, Hello… not a Sun type person” | ||
Brooks says “I’m pretty sure Rafi.. asked me to do it as a favour for a friend of his. By that very nature.. right to assume off the record” | ||
“Things I do really remember from the lunch,” says Brooks. “There was some kind of discussion… getting across her side of the story.” | ||
“Imbalance of the coverage was very unfair,” says Brooks of Eimear Cook (now) formerly Montgomerie. “She felt he was getting good coverage” | ||
“She wasn’t addressing the Sun newspaper coverage,” says Brooks “more criticising Mail and Mail on Sunday coverage.” | ||
“I was very surprised, she was a complete stranger to me,” says Brooks of Eimear Cook’s description of an incident in her marriage then. | ||
“An official was called to an incident in a hotel,” says Brooks. “I remember being very surprised.” | ||
“Also in 2005 we’d done quite a big campaign on domestic violence,” says Brooks “The Sun was working with Harriet Harman to get law changed” | ||
Brooks speaks about the changes in domestic violence law in 2005 – so that police could prosecute if they saw evidence. | ||
“The idea of a high profile woman talking to the Sun about this issue is something I remembered,” says Brooks of Eimear Cook lunch. | ||
“I took out of the lunch that she was asking me… giving me information on that incident, for the Sun to follow up,” says Brooks of lunch | ||
“Even if we found this official, to run a story about a sporting hero,” says Brooks “my instinct would have been to ask her join campaign” | ||
“I think we had a brief email exchange, and I think she declined” says Brooks of conscripting Eimear Cook to a Sun campaign | ||
“Since this case I’ve read and heard a lot,” says Brooks of that lunch with Eimear Cook: “I went there to help her improve her profile.” | ||
“I’ve only got her word for this incident, so I’ve no idea of her accuracy,” says Brooks. “Part of my campaign was to get women to speak out | ||
Laidlaw cites Eimear Cook’s witness statement – Brooks arriving late in a chauffeur driven car appearing a bit ‘grumpy’ – amended in court | ||
“I thought that didn’t ring true,” says Brooks of original grumpy description. | ||
Cook’s witness statement says Brooks was laughing while regaling the story of domestic incident with Ross Kemp. | ||
“No truth in that,” says Brooks. “When I first read it, it didn’t occur to me about dates… At the time it happened, it was end of marriage | ||
“It was a terrible incident in my life… I would not be laughing at this,” says Brooks. “The coverage was light hearted.” | ||
“The actor who played the brother in his show had had a similar incident that night,” Brooks says of publicity. | ||
“I don’t want to add to the humiliation,” says Laidlaw citing Sun piece. “Don’t worry,” says Brooks. | ||
Laidlaw refers back to Cook’s description of a phone hacking conversation: why people of wealth didn’t change factory PIN numbers. | ||
“It just doesn’t sound like the kind of thing I’d say,” say Brooks. “I did know from way back when there was a security fault on PINs” | ||
“I just wouldn’t say ‘stupid wealthy people'”, says Brooks: “It just doesn’t sound like the kind of thing I’d say.” | ||
Brooks on Eimear Cook’s account of a story about Heather Mills and Paul McCartney from voicemails: “Absolutely not, no” | ||
“I would never publish stories from phone hacking,” says Brooks of the McCartney/Mills allegation. | ||
“It’s a page 7 story in 2002: it’s only in the course of the case I’ve seen it again,” says Brooks of McCartney Mills ring story. | ||
We’re now turning to the hacking of Brooks’ phone | ||
Before that Laidlaw turns to the other campaigns Brooks was involved with | ||
Quick run through of Brooks’ NOTW editorials 29/12/02 edition moves onto domestic violence and men preying vulnerable women. | ||
“This is another thing I worked with David Blunkett on,” says Brooks of domestic violence. | ||
18/08/02 Deep Cut campaign is cited by Laidlaw: Brooks talks about “huge readerships with different consituencies” | ||
“NOTW and the Sun always campaigned for the welfare and treatment of the armed forces… this was me campaigning against bullying” Brooks | ||
Leticia Shakespeare’s death and gun crime cited: “this is us working with the police and a reward” | ||
President Clinton wrote a leader: “Most politicians would write for News of the World…. all the cabinet and shadow cabinet” says Brooks | ||
Damilola Taylor and Stephen Lawrence murder in NOTW: “Daily Mail deserve all the credit on Stephen Lawrence… we were doing same thing: | ||
Laidlaw introduces bundles of Counts 6 and 7 – allegations of coverup. “I’d like to deal with events of 2006,” says Laidlaw. | ||
“We’ll deal with them next before we turn to the Sun and Elveden charges,” says Laidlaw. Back after lunch | ||
Breakaway group – Southeast Alliance – getting kettled outside the Old Bailey pic.twitter.com/2IZsG9Rf84 | ||
Back at the #hackingtrial after a noisy lunch: EDL and breakaway groups protesting outside. | ||
Justice Saunders explains to the jury the absence this afternoon of Mark Hanna who has other business related to the case. | ||
Rebekah Brooks questioned on Arrests of Goodman and Mulcaire | ||
Brooks reaction to the arrest of Clive Goodman | ||
Laidlaw is not looking at the arrest of Mulcaire and Goodman: “You have long since left the editorship of the NOTW.” | ||
“I think I heard first from (employee) at the Sun,” says Brooks of arrest. “That’s because I read it in an email here.” | ||
“I had to go away a lot for News Corp conference and the like…. There’d been a conference in America… flown there to Italy,” says Brooks | ||
“I seem to remember the original information coming from… newsdesk, who’d be getting it from colleagues or the police,” says Brooks. | ||
“Because it was so confused I think it was just surprise,” says Brooks of initial information. Later heard raid by anti terrorist force | ||
“I would have almost certainly rang Andy Coulson,” says Brooks of arrest of Goodman and Mulcaire in August 2006 | ||
“I’m sure more than once as the picture developed,” says Brooks of her calls to Couslon after arrests. “It was a huge news story” | ||
“It was my old newspaper, and an old colleague involved,” says Brooks. There was shock and confusion. | ||
“Definitely, Clive had been arrested for intercepting the voicemails of Royal Household,” is Brooks non verbatim recollection of Coulson call | ||
“He sounded very shocked and concerned,” Brooks says of Coulson’s reaction. | ||
“It was almost the enormity of a raid at NOTW and the counter terrorism squad… never happened in the history of newspapers,” says Brooks | ||
“I think it was known quite early on another person had been arrested… I think I remember “two people arrested – that can’t be right”‘ | ||
Brooks says there was “uncertainty at the beginning to the veracity of the allegations” over phone hacking in 2006 | ||
On Goodman’s guilt Brooks says it was in November Goodman pleaded guilty: “I think I knew that when I went to see the police” (in September) | ||
Brooks: “I know I was away for the first few days of this developing news story… so I was told private detective… within first week” | ||
Brooks says she didn’t cut her holiday short in Italy because of the arrests. | ||
“Les Hinton… was also away,” says Brooks: “He’d also been at this News Corp event…. Les had taken a break too at that time.” | ||
“I remember having difficulty getting hold of him, (Les Hinton)” says Brooks. “But he returned to the country pretty quickly” | ||
Brooks says that Les Hinton took control as CEO, his deputy, Coulson and Kuttner and others managed the crisis. | ||
Asked if she was involved in managing post arrest crisis at NI, Brooks says to her counsel Laidlaw: “No, not at all” | ||
Brooks said Goodman Mulcaire arrest “felt like” headline news: “Sun newsdesk as interested as anyone else” | ||
Brooks says she was now hearing things “more informally” from Hinton and Coulson about arrests. | ||
“Our point of view at the Sun,” says Brooks “there was disbelief at first… shock and surprise at Clive.” | ||
Brooks says “there was a certain amount of grumpiness at the Sun” about the use of private detectives by NOTW “not used much at the Sun” | ||
Brooks talks about the collective failure over use of private investigators “not only at the Sun but among lawyers etc and other industries” | ||
Brooks said she asked her Sun staff about use of private detectives: “We don’t use these kinds of people do we?” | ||
“The Sun was always very low in its use of private detectives compared to other papers,” says Brooks of Mulcaire arrest. | ||
Brooks said she continued speak to Coulson and Les Hinton “but not in any formal way…. I’d see Les two or three times a day.” | ||
“Andy and I would speak regularly anyway,” says Brooks. She spoke to other staff shared by News International | ||
Brooks is asked about “corporate reaction”: “a great deal of concern was everyone’s reaction” | ||
Brooks “Initially there was certainly concern about the investigation… where it was going, was the counter terrorism squad was doing.” | ||
“It had come out that Counter Terrorism was looking at Mulcaire for quite a long time before the arrests,” says Brooks at #hackingtrial | ||
Asked about “periods of time” involved in the investigation, Brooks says initially about 2005/06 | ||
Brooks says that that nine months the police were looking at before arrest were thought to be the area of investigation. | ||
“Between the story breaking and me going to see the police,” is when Brooks said she got to know Mulcaire’s name: 04/08/06 to 14/09/06 | ||
“I think his name came out quite quickly,” says Brooks of Mulcaire. | ||
BREAKING: Brooks says she didn’t know Mulcaire was employed by NOTW “for a long time” until an internal investigation after his arrest | ||
“I think I had that knowledge before I went to see the police,” says Brooks of Mulcaire employment for NOTW. | ||
Brooks says she cannot remember who told her about Mulcaire working for NOTW: various informal discussions with NI execs. | ||
“I certainly informed him I was going to see counter terrorism group” says Brooks of NI exec. | ||
“It stands to reason if a Royal Editor…and private investigator also arrrested, NOTW would have done some checks,” says Brooks. | ||
“I know so much now,” Brooks says of Mulcaire contract. “The retainers must have come to light pretty quickly.” | ||
Brooks is asked whether she had any “anxiety” about Mulcaire revelations: “Not from a personal point of view” | ||
“It was more reflective… of the private detective situation… nothing to do with intercepting voicemail… was a collective failure” | ||
“I certainly had no personal concern,” says Brooks of Mulcaire revelation | ||
Brooks met DSupt Surtees in Sept 06 – she says he rang her and they organised a meeting: “I remember two people being there” | ||
Brooks Phone Hacked | ||
“The conversation was… along the lines, he wanted to talk to me about my voicemail. Because they had evidence been accessing” Brooks. | ||
“I seem to remember 18 months being said,” Brook recalls of how long she had been hacked. “They wanted me to be a prosecution witness” | ||
“They were investigating a sister newspaper… naturally they didn’t want to come to the office,” says Brooks of meeting with Surtees | ||
BREAKING: Brooks says her reaction to being hacking “I was pretty shocked… certainly surprised. I had a personal PIN code” | ||
“You natural reaction would be “how” “why”…. I’d changed my PIN code years ago. I thought it would be secure,” says Brooks | ||
“I probably didn’t want to go to the police station,” says Brooks: “So we met at the RAC club in Pall Mall.” | ||
Brooks said she informed Les Hinton, Coulson and others straight away about police calls. Then told Rupert Murdoch what police had said | ||
“I seem to remember Andy Coulson was pretty startled, and Les Hinton the same,” says Brooks of telling them of counter terrorism | ||
“I had a natural curiosity to find out what happened to my phone… how he done it for how long, and who for” says Brooks of her own hacking | ||
“I wanted to know what the police could tell me,” Brooks says of meeting phone hacking investigating officer. | ||
Jury shown again handwritten notes of the meeting between Brooks and Dept Supt Surtees at RAC club, transposed into an email. | ||
“They tend to go in pairs,” says Justice Saunders of the memory of two police officers at RAC club. | ||
Brooks said she would have told her senior Sun team, Hinton, Coulson and another senior NI exec. | ||
15/09/06 email to Coulson from NI exec appears to be a record of Brooks’ meeting with police. | ||
Brooks says the meeting with police at the RAC club would have lasted “an hour and a half…. I think we met for coffee.” | ||
Brooks says the detective chief superintendent explained the practice of phone hacking to her. She knew of security flaws and had pin code | ||
Brooks; “Their belief was that Glenn Mulcaire had my personal pin code. The asked,,, Had I given him permission to access my voicemails?” | ||
“One of the reasons they wanted me to be a prosecution witness was because one of my new voicemails had been accessed,” says Brooks | ||
“I still don’t quite understand the law,” says Brooks about phone interception law. | ||
“Cheryl might have had my mobile on charge when I was editing the Sun,” says Brooks | ||
“They asked me if anything that came from my voicemail might have made it into the public domain,” says Brooks of phone hacking. | ||
The only occasion Brooks can think of was a trip to Paris and a report “I had a new boyfriend”: female friend had left jokey message. | ||
“I think they explained to me they needed… enough victims to come forward as prosecution witnesses, to get the quantum” says Brooks. | ||
“It was a very casual information conversation,” says Brooks of meeting with Chief Super: “We had good relationships with counter terrorism” | ||
“I know I would have gone to that meeting to discover the latest from the horse’s mouth, so to speak” says Brooks. | ||
“It was a sister newspaper, they were close colleagues,” says Brooks of her curiosity of police investigation. | ||
Laidlaw points out that in neither of these executive records of that RAC club meeting is there any mention of Brooks’ personal position | ||
Brooks addresses previously seen email to Coulson on Mulcaire and Goodman “bang to rights on palace intercepts” | ||
The email speaks of raids obtaining 100-110 victims from Mulcaire’s notes and voicemails. | ||
Email also speaks of NOTW payment records “going way back…. over one million of payments” to Mulcaire. | ||
“I think I knew before I went to see DCI Surtees… Mulcaire had been working before, after and during my editorship,” says Brooks. | ||
“The amount was a surprise,” says Brooks; “though not the fact he was a private detective” | ||
NB; Surtees sometimes called a Detective Chief Inspector and others a Detective Superintendent: don’t know which is accurate | ||
“It’s hard to remember if consistency or frequency” was the main interest of investigating police Brooks says of the email note. | ||
Email to Coulson speaks of “not widening the case” unless they had NOTW journos directly accessing voicemails. | ||
Email talks of Hugh Grant and Jemima Khan story directly reflecting a hacked voicemail. | ||
“I think you had to… make a formal complaint before they could use your evidence in a court case,” Brooks says of going back to police. | ||
Brooks assumes she briefed exec face to face rather than on the phone. | ||
Brooks confirms Surtees never told her of “evidence of criminal wrong doing under her editorship, or that it was of interest to him” | ||
“I would have reported back a version of the conversation with the people I told,” says Brooks: “more detail with Les Hinton” | ||
Brooks said she told Coulson her own phone had been hacked immediately after initial call from police. | ||
“Did Ross feature in anyway in your discussions with police,” asks Laidlaw. “Not really,” says Brooks. | ||
“I think Ross came up in the context of him asking me some formal questions… well I have a pretty disastrous time,” says Brooks. | ||
“There was stark competition between the two papers, but the NOTW wouldn’t run something personal stories about me and Ross” says Brooks | ||
Brooks says she wasn’t shown any records at this point: she wasn’t told Ross Kemp’s name was also in Mulcaire’s notes. | ||
Brooks “We all agreed it would not be right to make a formal complaint and be a witness with the complexities it would cause on corp level” | ||
Laidlaw for the defence has put the hacking of Brooks’ phone in a similar timeline to other phone hacking victims | ||
This timeline actually relates to the hacking of both Brooks and Coulson. | ||
Ten minute break | ||
Brooks says she assumed the £1m to Mulcaire was for checks and tracing people, | ||
“I suppose if I thought about it logically it wouldn’t have been a million pounds for that,” says Brooks of Mulcaire payments. | ||
In 29/11/06 both Goodman and Mulcaire pleaded guilty to various phone hacking counts: Goodman to Royal Household. | ||
“I think there were about five victims,” says Brooks of initial Mulcaire conviction. | ||
“Nothing really changed from that initial meeting” Brooks says of Goodman and Mulcaire guilty pleas. | ||
Coulson Resignation | ||
Brooks spoke to both Andy Coulson and Les Hinton about Coulson’s resignation: “it happened under his watch” | ||
“Though there was never any suggestion he knew what these two people were doing, it was his responsibility” says Brooks of Coulson resigning | ||
“There were quite a few things being talked about after sentencing,” says Brooks of NI at the time. | ||
“It had confirmed GM’s payments going way back were for what PIs did, and not for voicemail hacking,” says Brooks. | ||
“That was the end of criminal proceedings,” says Brooks. “I can’t remember when the police said ‘nothing more to see here: time to move on” | ||
Brooks talks about Hinton public statement “voice mail interception limited to Clive Goodman” a “vigorous internal investigation” by NI | ||
“There were public statements of this being a “rogue exception”.. and Andy Coulson not being involved,” says Brooks of 2007 | ||
“It wasn’t just said publically, but said internally aswell,” Brooks says of this first investigation being complete. | ||
Brooks says she was not concerned at this point about her own role. | ||
Saunders asks if Brooks was concerned, like Andy Coulson, that “something was going on under our shift” | ||
“I still believe that now as I did in 2006,” Brooks says of stories being sourced from phone hacking at NOTW during her editorship | ||
“I don’t remember feeling that” says Brooks to Saunders question as to whether she might have resigned even if she didn’t know. | ||
Brooks is asked about PCC statement after arrest of Coulson and Mulcaire. | ||
“From this position the PCC still seemed confused about it,” Brooks says of PCC letter | ||
Laidlaw turns to a draft letter adduced by the prosecution: “I remember thinking I don’t remember writing that” | ||
Brooks explains that the original letter might have come from her, but the PCC issues were dealt with another executive. | ||
The PCC letter from NI reflects the language of initial PCC inquiry. It also talks about cash payments – Laidlaw says he’ll examine tomorrow | ||
Brooks meeting with Clive Goodman after Prison release | ||
Laidlaw now turns to Brooks’ lunch with Goodman 12/04/07 – again at the RAC club. Expenses and diary adduced. | ||
Brooks had lunch with Goodman at RAC club shortly after he was released. Brooks confirms she offered him a job. | ||
BREAKING: Brooks says the idea of offering Clive Goodman a job post release from jail came from both her and Les Hinton. | ||
“A week or so before the lunch… Goodman had launched an employment tribunal appeal… ” says Brooks. | ||
“I think Clive Goodman had been expecting to return to his job when he came out of prison,” says Brooks. | ||
“He had discovered on home leave that his contract had been terminated,” says Brooks. Letter from head of HR or CEO. | ||
“That had not been his understanding, I don’t know how or why,” says Brooks of Goodman’s expectation he would keep his job. | ||
“He wanted I think a financial settlement or his job back… his anger at being dismissed when on home leave,” says Brooks. | ||
“He wanted a financial settlement… the company hadn’t agreed to his terms.. he was going to allege other people at NOTW knew,” says Brooks | ||
“Certainly that others were involved in that practice,” says Brooks of Goodman allegations. | ||
“There was concern at NI that… though a line had been drawn… to go through an embarrassing employment tribunal… damaging headlines” | ||
BREAKING: Brooks says she thinks Goodman was alleging “pretty much everybody” was involving in phone hacking at NOTW | ||
Brooks says that the NOTW editor, deputy editor and managing editor were all involved in Goodman’s tribunal allegations. | ||
Brooks says she’s sure the allegations didn’t involve her. And this was only a baseless allegation because of Goodman’s employment tribunal | ||
“The corporate side of the business had received this tribunal claim” says Brooks. John Chapman and Daniel Cloke were involved with Hinton | ||
Laidlaw: “Do you believe the truth of these allegations: Brooks: “I had no reason to… I had it from counter terrorism…from horse’s mouth | ||
“I probably had a lot of my reassurance from my initial meeting with the police, ” says Brooks. “The police closed the investigation” | ||
“The judge had said the cash payments part of Mulcaires deal… were for private detective work,” says Brooks | ||
“At that time I have a firm basis of belief there was no foundation for these allegations,” says Brooks. “This happens in tribunals” | ||
“I saw Les Hinton two or three times a day… he gave me all my promotions, except the last one,” says Brooks. | ||
Brooks:”I don’t know if he knew I knew Fran, or that I’d worked with Clive way back when… but I was the right person to find a middle way” | ||
“It’s a delicate situation… two sides to every story… Clive was angry… felt unfairly treated,” says Brooks of meeting Goodman. | ||
“A line had been drawn under this, for the company to then have to go through this allegations, though unfounded, it was delicate situation” | ||
“When I went to see Clive he wasn’t best pleased as to what had happened to him… my offer was of another way to solve it” Brooks says | ||
“I don’t know who came up with the idea…. Let’s just say it was my idea, It wouldn’t have been right for him to return to Royal Editor.” | ||
“It was the tenth anniversary of Diana’s death and we were doing a tribute magazine. So that’s one of the thoughts I had” says Brooks | ||
Brooks says Goodman’s response was “muted…didn’t give me impression that he was particularly interested… he was very civil” | ||
“It was quite formal discussion,” says Brooks of Goodman lunch. She says they had not seen much of each other since she left NOTW editorship | ||
Brooks says of Goodman lunch: “I didn’t get the impression a backroom job… was of interest” | ||
Brooks comments on the email she sent to Goodman after the lunch. “About four weeks on from then,” notices Justice Saunders. | ||
“I assume I’m just chasing him up,” says Brooks. Laidlaw reads out her email: “I just need a decision on the Diana project.” | ||
18/05/07 Brooks writes again to Goodman about a position at the Sun. He did not take up offer of job. | ||
“I’m sure I’d been told it had been settled, but the details I did not know at the time,” Brooks says of Goodman tribunal against NI | ||
Brooks says until she appointed to CEO in 2009, she had nothing else to do with corporate response to phone hacking. Back tomorrow. |
Note: All the defendants deny all the charges. The trial continues.
Related Articles
Peter Jukes on ABC Radio
Rebekah Brooks Takes The Stand At Phone Hacking Trial – The Daily Beast
The Brooks Plan B and Blair Unofficial Advisor emails
Half Time at the Phone Hacking Trial
How the Kindness of Strangers crowd funded my Hacking Trial coverage
Previous Posts
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 20 Feb
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 21 Feb
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 25 Feb
Links: The Trial So Far | Full Trial Summary | Indexed Evidence | Breaking News
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 27 Feb | Live Tweeting the hacking trial
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 28 Feb | Live Tweeting the hacking trial
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 3 Mar | Live Tweeting the hacking trial