Thursday 27 February 2014
Summary | ||
Rebekah Brooks Defence Continues on Count 5 – Illegal Payments | ||
Court matters and more evidence provided to Jury | ||
Books Questioned on her Editorship of The Sun | ||
Brooks Appointed Editor of the Sun | ||
Brooks describes how an edition of the Sun is put together | ||
Issues covered by the Sun under Brooks | ||
Brooks admits mistakes | ||
Count 5 – Conspiracy to commit misconduct in a public office | ||
Brooks questioned on illegal payments to MOD officials | ||
Brooks Contacts with Senior Officials | ||
Payments to Public Officials | ||
Thomas Cook Payments | ||
Payments to MOD Offocials |
Rebekah Brooks Defence Continues on Count 5 – Illegal Payments | ||
Court matters and more evidence provided to Jury | ||
Justice Saunders welcomes back in the jury to Court 12 and the #hackingtrial with the 6th day of Rebekah Brooks‘ testimony | ||
One of the jurors has a medical appointment a week on Monday: to save time Justice Saunders would prefer not to break for long lunch | ||
Langdale for Coulson asks if his client can leave the dock since today’s evidence does not concern him. He won’t be far away. | ||
A rustling of paper as a new tab is inserted by Jonathan Laidlaw, QC, counsel for Brooks, into the jury bundle | ||
“I shouldn’t bother to tidy up,” says Justice Saunders of these bundles: “Forlorn hope” | ||
“We’re going to move to the Sun and Count Five,” Laidlaw tells the jury, and produces a file of selected Sun articles. | ||
“This is tempting providence but it’s remarkable no water has been knocked over yet” says Saunders. “Usually the judge who knocks over water | ||
Books Questioned on her Editorship of The Sun | ||
Brooks Appointed Editor of the Sun | ||
Brooks explains the 5.30 meeting with Les Hinton during which she was appointed as Editor of the Sun. She started the next day | ||
Brooks says Hinton and Murdoch wanted the “campaigning side” at the Sun. They’d been quite pleased with tone of NOTW and wanted that at Sun | ||
Brooks “They were concerned the Sun had got interested in pure politics…. Westminster Village, minutiae, rather than the issues behind it” | ||
Brooks said they wanted the Sun to be “funnier… softer”. Brooks replaced David Yelland. Coulson took over the NOTW. | ||
Brooks explains she took some trusted people from the Sun with her to NOTW, and some of this core back to the Sun in 2003. | ||
Brooks describes how an edition of the Sun is put together | ||
Brooks explains her working day at the Sun: 9.30 start up to quite late. | ||
“Monday to Friday,” Brooks says about work at the Sun, “to quite late” with evening meals and meetings. | ||
“Friday deadlines for the Saturday Sun were much earlier,” explains Brooks; “So you could get away early… 7ish” | ||
Brooks says there were periods of times when it was a six day week: “First two years I was in and out on a Sunday” | ||
“I was seeing different people editing it, their choices,” Brook explains of Sundays: “as I got my own team in place it wasn’t necessary” | ||
Laidlaw goes through the “Editor’s Life” at the Sun: reading all the papers, listening to the Today Programme 8.10 interview, watching TV. | ||
The first news conference at the Sun is at about 11 am: “ideas… anything from serious to funny… normally attended by features” | ||
11.30 was 30/40 min main conference at the Sun where every department head attended, with news lists produced for breaking/developed stories | ||
The next meeting is “Pages and Plot” at noon: minimum 56 pages up to 120 pages on the Saturday: short window to fill them. | ||
Brooks talks of “overnight” pages being prepared before: Dear Deidre, Gardening, etc – “each day had a different feel”: health, Sun Woman | ||
Then the “flat plan” was produced at the Sun based on what editors said would be ready by the cut-off time in the evening | ||
Lunch was “at the desk” or “at a conference room which had been converted” as editor of the Sun, Brooks explains. | ||
“We call it “the rattling express train” throughout the afternoon, ” Brooks continues: “It’s quite a tight deadline” | ||
The deadline shifting as NI were updating their printing and publishing systems with a piece of software called Hermes. | ||
“We had to be in pretty good shape for first edition by 7 or 7.30… first edition for the streets or remote places like Bodmin” Brooks says | ||
Brooks says “saturday edition could be up to 100,000 work… I know its not War and Peace but.. daily editions about 40,000 words” | ||
Brooks explains the business side of marketing, advertising etc. beyond the editorial duties. | ||
“Marketing was huge part of being an editor,” says Brooks. “On NOTW budget £10-12m – on the Sun much much more than that.” | ||
Brooks says she would have final approval on any TV ads, would oversee promotions such as free CDs, in a bidding war for old Carry On films | ||
“The biggest markets were the supermarket chains,” says Brooks of the Sun’s main ad revenue and having to meet clients | ||
“Jeremy Clarkson was very critical of many car plants, particularly Honda… the editor would be summoned to explain actions of the team” | ||
Last tweet was about firefighting problems between advertisers and editorial at the Sun | ||
“There was a constant clash,” says Brooks between advertising and editorial, and production, because “you wanted to print as late as poss” | ||
“Occassionally” Brooks would meet advertiser, but “mainly with senior politicians, senior police officers, people from security services” | ||
“The politicians go to Wapping.” asks Saunders. “Yes,” says Brooks of cabinet and shadow cabinet. | ||
Brooks: “Politicians like to tell the press all the good stuff they’re up to… the lobby is the hub… but they like to see the senior team | ||
“If they didn’t like something you’d done… a meeting would be arranged,” says Brooks. “Or 20 readers asking the PM 20 questions” | ||
Brooks says she had high level meeting with pols and police “once or twice a month… but things were in the evenings as well” | ||
“Senior police officers would come in, usually if there was an issue… the same with the military, especially in my editorship” says Brooks | ||
“We were at war from the time I started my editorship to the time I finished,” says Brooks of military conflict during tenure at the Sun | ||
Brooks says she wrote all her emails herself, and not her PAs. Can’t estimate how many emails: “I haven’t had access since I was arrested” | ||
Brooks says there were 11,000 emails in her inbox when she left. She guesses she got “hundreds” of emails a day. | ||
“I communicated with Cheryl and Debs by email… it was easier. Probably more than normal. I tended to use computer on my desk.” Brooks | ||
“In 2008 we finally got Blackberries and that changed the way we communicated,” Brooks says of email communication. | ||
“I think I’ve had it for about 18 years,” says Brooks of her mobile. “I think the might have added a couple of digits – 07 – nationally” | ||
Issues covered by the Sun under Brooks | ||
“With a selection of front pages and articles,” Laidlaw wants to go through the tone and range and some of the issues Brooks covered at Sun | ||
Brooks says they sold advertising to 8 to 10 million readers. “Our first pillar was to be incredibly supportive of the troops.” | ||
“The armed forces was a very big part of the paper… we went to war in Iraq quite quickly after I became editor. “ | ||
“The MOD budget is 30 billion… a huge amount of tax payers money… we held them to account. 300k active service personnel.” says Brooks | ||
“We were very supportive of the troops… but certainly felt we could hold the MOD to account,” says Brooks of the Sun. | ||
Brooks talks about the anti-war feeling in Britain around Iraq: “the country wasn’t in agreement in the main,” she says. | ||
“There were a few incidents of troops coming back and being abused in the street around 04-05,” says Brooks. | ||
Brooks mentions the formation of Help for Heroes, helped by the Sun and Jeremy Clarkson. | ||
Brooks mentions “Deepcut” and “systematic bullying of troops, with suicides” | ||
“I rambling, I’m sorry,” says Brooks to Saunders. “Let’s not get into too many unnecessary issues,” he explains. | ||
Various Sun front pages from the Iraq Invasion in 2003 are shown to the jury. | ||
We’re now up to May 2004 post the capture of Saddam | ||
“It wasn’t blanket support…. it was critical,” says Brooks of Sun coverage of Iraq. | ||
“This is the start of Help for Heroes,” says Brooks of October 2007 edition. Prince William lends his support. | ||
Prince Harry, other celebrities and footballers add their support for Help for Heroes in editions of Sun shown to jury in #hackingtrial | ||
“There was a news blackout while he was there,” says Brooks of Prince Harry‘s tour in Iraq | ||
We’re now up to May 2009 in Sun headlines with troops leaving Iraq | ||
To those complaining about my tweets today – I’m committed to reporting all the details of the hacking trial without comment | ||
Jury told of Sun military awards very much like the Police Bravery awards. | ||
Laidlaw talks of Brooks work on domestic violence, and the massacre at Beslan | ||
Another Sun campaign is cited to jury, to promote adoption and the ‘Be my Parent’ magazine | ||
Brooks talks about her involvement in “Make Poverty History Campaign’ and Comic Relief. | ||
Brooks talks about “too much emphasis on predatory paedophiles” and that abuse happens mainly to those “known to the child” | ||
Breast cancer, animal RSPCA, anti-crime, African, Josie Russell campaigns also mentioned to jury | ||
Death of Ben Kinsella and jobs campaigns also cited in this selection of Sun pages compiled by Brooks’ defence with her help | ||
Political coverage includes: BNP, voter apathy, “not being terribly kind to Tory challenge” in 2005 | ||
Celebrity and Football: “very important part of the Sun” – Beckham, Rooney. | ||
International stories “illustrate the broad church the Sun was: If you hadn’t read it you obvious think of celebrity, Page 3 and football” | ||
Laidlaw talks about 7/7 coverage and a readers picture of the bombing. Brooks: “Our relationship with the readers became more interactive” | ||
Brooks speaks of a “reporter undercover investigating in hospitals” and the “risks associated with story” | ||
Saunders: “But you were speaking of the public interested rather than committing a criminal offence” Brooks confirms of undercover reporting | ||
Security breaches at the Royal Palaces and the House of Commons also cited. Sun exclusives shown to jury: Soham, prisoner lotto winner | ||
“The lotto rapist was a tracing situation, and his victims had had usual paltry compensation,” Brooks says of tracking him down. | ||
Football, Boy Wonder and Rugby World Cup cited, “we were eternally optimistic about the England football team,” says Brooks. | ||
“This shows just how often sport came to the front of the paper,” Brooks explains of tapping up scandal, ashes victory etc. | ||
“Some regrets,” saids Laidlaw of last article bundle from Sun:”which at least give this thing a bit of… some balance.” | ||
Brooks admits mistakes | ||
“I personally made lots of mistakes during my 10-12 years as editor and deputy editor,” Brooks explains of this dossier of ‘regrets’ | ||
Brooks is now addressing a Frank Bruno front page in the Sun | ||
“I had a complete blankspot to “Bonkers Bruno Locked Up’ headline – a terrible mistake I made,” says Brooks. But only 15,000 copies. | ||
“We apologised immediately… I went on a course with Saneline…. about how we covered mental health,” says Brooks about Bruno headline | ||
“In those flashes of speed, you can look at something perfectly wrong, and not see it.” says Brooks. Now turns to death of Harold Shipman | ||
The Sun headline speaks of the Home Secretary opening a bottle of champagne: the headline was probably in bad taste | ||
Brooks talks about an article about Page Three and Claire Short ‘where I went too far” | ||
“The navy banned it once and all the sailors went on strike,” says Brooks of Page 3: but calls this “cruel and harsh – too personal” | ||
“You asked me to think of all the things I got wrong,” says Brooks. “Odd thing to ask of a client,” says Saunders. “Just giving balance” | ||
Jury are shown a story which could still be the subject of litigation and so it passed over quickly | ||
Brooks regrets treatment of Baby P social worker: “In the furore and passion… our attacks, harassment, photographer outside her house” | ||
Back after a short break at the #hackingtrial | ||
Count 5 – Conspiracy to commit misconduct in a public office | ||
Brooks questioned on illegal payments to MOD officials | ||
“We come then to Count 5,” says Laidlaw: “allegation to commit misconduct in public office involving Sun journo and Bettina Jordan-Barber” | ||
Laidlaw says we’ll look in due time to 11 email Brooks sent agreement payment to MOD official | ||
“I didn’t know who her name was,” says Brooks. She also says she didn’t know Jordan-Barber was a public official | ||
BREAKING: Brooks tells jury at #hackingtrial she did not know name of MOD source paid for Sun stories or that she was public official | ||
Brooks talks about her relationship with police officers, and helping start up police bravery awards while deputy editor of the Sun | ||
Brooks Contacts with Senior Officials | ||
Brooks says she had regular contacts with “very senior” police officers: “commissioner of Met police… other chief constables” | ||
“I had pretty good relationship with former chief constable of Manchester, partly because I’m from Warrington,” says Brooks | ||
Brooks also says she had good relationships with Counter Terrorism and Paedophile Unit | ||
Brooks says she had contacts with “chief of navy, army, RAF… very senior rank. Particularly some of the commanders out in Helmand, CoS” | ||
The meetings with Senior Police officers often at Scotland Yard: senior military at “private dinners”: the 1st Sea Lord at HMS Illustrious | ||
Brooks speaks of contact with MI5 and MI6 | ||
“Less with GCHQ, more with MI5 and MI6,” says Brooks: “along with specialist reporter… at Director General level” | ||
Laidlaw, counsel for Brooks, now speaks to the PCC code about receiving info from public officials and whether “money was involved” | ||
“Looking at 2005-6, “asks Laidlaw: “Did the code then…. deal in terms with public officials position?” “Not directly,” says Brooks | ||
Brooks says the Sun had “frequent” leaks from public officials at Cabinet level | ||
“At the height of the Blair Brown ‘feud’ we found people in both camps willing to talk… all of which could be considered public officials” | ||
None of those leaks required payment, emphasises Laidlaw. “Quite common” Brooks says for police during a crime story. | ||
Brooks: “A journalist who has specialised in crime all their career… they have police officers… they’ve worked their way up together” | ||
Brooks: “I’ve always thought relationship between police and press as symbiotic… helping each other… it was a usual situation” | ||
“Because there was so much focus on the military,” says Brooks. “We were the (perhaps self appointed) paper for the military.” | ||
With unpaid info politicians, police officers and the military Brooks says this “very rarely” brought her in conflict with PCC code. | ||
Brooks says “very rarely” related to Official Secrets Act and D-Notice Committee that could endanger troops on the ground | ||
“Very sensitive information had to be subjected to more analysis,” says Brooks of Military leaks. | ||
“The code was at the centre of everything,” says Brooks and she felt there was no conflict with unpaid information from public officials | ||
Payments to Public Officials | ||
Brooks says there were requests for payment from some public officials. | ||
BREAKING: Brooks says she understood only “an overwhelming public interest” can justify a public official being paid for information | ||
Brooks: “If there was not a public interest defence it wasn’t done. It was considered illegal if… it was directly in line with their role” | ||
BREAKING: Brooks confirms she has paid public officials for info relating to their work from “half a dozen” occasions. | ||
These handful of occasions were from 1998 when Brooks was either acting up as an editor or was an editor. | ||
“We greatly debated what was in the public interest,” says Brooks of that decision of paying public officials. | ||
Brooks says the distinction between “public interest” and “what the public is interested in” is very “subjective” | ||
“There’s a public interest in freedom of expression itself… everyone always finds it very difficult to address,” says Brooks. | ||
Brooks says “each newspaper has its own interpretation of the public interest” but “never any official guidelines” | ||
Brooks is asked about a journalist who cannot be named for legal reasons. | ||
There may be a bit of a twitter silence from me during this part of the evidence – for legal reasons. | ||
This journalist “seemed to have contacts and sources from many walks of life” says Brooks | ||
Brooks is asked about journalistic sources: x “never told me any confidential sources… standard thing in industry.” | ||
“But that’s not to say there weren’t obvious sources,” says Brooks: “each story has to be taken on an individual basis.” | ||
“Once you start paying a source… there’s a confidentiality that arises between you and that source…a sensitive area” says Brooks. | ||
Brooks says “confidential sources kept incredibly tight”. | ||
Brooks talks about various specialities at the Sun | ||
Both sides agree that a Sun journalist was paying a public official: Bettina Jordan-Barber. Brooks says again she didn’t know this. | ||
BREAKING: Brooks says payments to MOD official from the Sun “should have been brought to my attention… so I could take responsibility” | ||
Brooks is asked: “It must have been obvious from the stories themselves that the source must have been a public official” | ||
Brooks replies “you don’t often just get a story from one source. Sometimes you get a tip from one source. Sometimes a confirmation” | ||
“There’s a certain element of trust that goes on throughout newspapers,” says Brooks: “because of the manicness of the day” | ||
Brooks says source could be retired officials:”Particularly in the military when you can retire very young… or the police for that matter” | ||
“Lot of ex officials could write for us and be paid openly” says Brooks of Sun columnists. | ||
Brooks explains how journalists start at garrison towns and develop contacts and sources, and “get on to a national” with a good story. | ||
“There’s huge scope without an automatic assumption it’s a public official,” says Brooks of stories about army, police etc. | ||
Thomas Cook Payments | ||
Brooks is asked about the Thomas Cook nature of payments to Jordan-Barber and her memory of procedures at the Sun. | ||
Thomas Cook payments are forms of cash payments – source ends up with notes in their hands. | ||
Brooks says that what they meant at NI cash payments was a ‘docket system’ involved a cashier’s office | ||
“Thomas Cook was a way of getting…. cash to people who couldn’t be in Wapping… not only sources.” says Brooks. | ||
“If you had a reporter out abroad who needed cash to pay a fixer… there would be a global wire transfer you could use,” says Brooks. | ||
“The Sun always had the same policy around cash payments” says Brooks: they had to be signed off by department head and editor of day. | ||
Brooks thinks the managing editor could also sign off cash payments, but CPRs all went through that office. | ||
“The only difference in Thomas Cook…. over a certain level it had to have that editor of day approval. I think it was higher,” says Brooks | ||
“There has to be some fluidity in terms of financial systems,” says Brooks of uncertainty over approval limits on cash payments. | ||
Brooks: “In cash payments there’s no trail, but with Thomas Cook you always had to show some identification… my experience was in America” | ||
Saunders asks about editorial signing off system: “was it about value for money or insuring cash wasn’t paid to wrong people?” | ||
“Probably a bit of both,” says Brooks of cash limits in terms of “value and validity” | ||
“He thinks what he’s saying to you is the truth”: Lenny Henry on his character Frank Watt in Day Release http://bbc.in/1kiLfRR my new play | ||
Back after lunch at the #hackingtrial | ||
Payments to MOD Offocials | ||
“I’ll continue to make myself very unpopular with everyone,” says Laidlaw about adding two more defence bundles for Brooks. | ||
Laidlaw explains the index to a large blue file with 11 white tabs covering the 11 times Brooks authorised a payment to MOD official | ||
The files on Count 5 set out source of MOD story, nature of story, final published piece and relevant authorising email | ||
A second large matching blue file has articles and emails but with most the other military articles to be found in the Sun over this period | ||
In Laidlaw’s new bundles there’s also a calendar view from January 2003 to September 2009 covering whole of Brooks’ editorship of Sun | ||
Laidlaw goes to 01/01/04 where the indictment period for Count 5 begins. 18/06/06 is a period of maternity leave for Jordan-Barber. | ||
Laidlaw is going to ask Brooks whether each story justified payment because it was “overwhelmingly in the public interest” | ||
According to Laidlaw Brooks was away in 04/10/06 at Conservative Party conference for a story about an alcoholic instructor at barracks | ||
“I wouldn’t have seen this on the production day, but certainly on the publication day,” says Brooks of this article. | ||
“I would have been in contact with the desk,” says Brooks of her day at party conference. “But I would have read it the next day” | ||
Brooks: “It could have been anybody, any source, could have been the bus driver…. wouldn’t have indicated to me there was a payment” | ||
“Nothing would have flagged up to me there was an issue with it,” Brooks says of 2006. She asked today whether she would have paid today | ||
“Certainly I would have felt there was a public interest element to this story…. senior personal bullying the troops,” Brooks says. | ||
“Though Captain Boozy headline is very ‘Sun’ there is a serious element,” but Brooks is not sure she would have authorised payment. | ||
“£1k for his story is not excessive,” says Brooks. “The money would have been a consideration,’ she continues on public interest. | ||
Laidlaw says 34 articles in Sun till 13/11/06 Jordan-Barber sourced piece about intelligence officer. Brooks was off to Australia. | ||
“I’m beginning to get the impression you were never there,” jokes Justice Saunders. | ||
This is a Page 2 Sun article: “I would have read it the next day…. in 2006 probably a lot online” | ||
Brooks: “I wouldn’t have particularly thought it did or didn’t come from a public official. In PI terms, so many women on the front line” | ||
“No, it would have come out anyway,” says Brooks of justifying a payment to a public official on this particular story. | ||
Another story about a recruit in a coma is cited by Laidlaw, sourced from Jordan-Barber. “You do appear to have been in office when plotted” | ||
“It’s a military connected with bullying… I mentioned Deepcut… it’s a live issue… I’m sure I would,” says Brooks about public interest | ||
“The tip for this story could have come from a variety of sources… particularly on recruits and bullying,” says Brooks. | ||
“I think I would have done,” says Brooks of paying public officials for this story. “I had evidence from Deepcut these things didn’t comeout | ||
Brooks says she thinks £3,000 “reasonable” for this story. | ||
Email to Brooks citing military contact, listing the 3 stories “£4.5k which I think cheap at the prices”: Brooks replies “of course” in mins | ||
Brooks: “I’m absolutely sure I would have remembered the recruit speared… I would have been in a meeting. Lots of emails coming through” | ||
“I’m not reading this email now thinking there’s something wrong…. it’s exactly where we wanted to be with the recruits,” says Brooks. | ||
Brooks in response to first email and £4.5k payment: “Yes, cheap at the price I would have thought,” | ||
August 2007: Calendar shows Brooks away 13-28th August: away when article published 17/08/07 | ||
“I would always got to a place called newspaper direct…. and don’t forget onlne,” explains Brooks of this article about Sandhurst soldier | ||
Brooks says she wouldn’t have sanctioned a payment for a story of this sort if it had come to her. | ||
Story of Prince William‘s major killed by Taliban 06/10/07 – Brooks was at work. | ||
The death of Major Roberts killed by a roadside IED was the front page of the Sun on 06/10/07 | ||
“I would have assumed it was relatively official coming in unpaid for,” says Brooks about Major Robert splash. | ||
“It’s difficult doing the hypothetical,” says Brooks of paying for this story. “The problem is that is going to come out” | ||
“There’s certainly an exclusivity to it which helps,” Brooks says about the Major Roberts death. But probably wouldn’t pay | ||
Email on 15/10/07 asking for authorisation of payment “belting exclusive splash” and the “Sandhurst sex scandal”: Brooks “Brilliant scoop” | ||
“I know it’s boring. I keep repeating myself…. but with the countless military stories…. plethora of sources… I wasn’t policing.” | ||
“The Sun led the headlines all that, that’s what is probably in my head” says Brooks of payment authorisation | ||
25/10/07 Sun article on the funeral for Major Roberts cited (Help for Heroes launched 4 days later) | ||
“It could have been anyone at the funeral,” says Brooks: “Had it been a public official would have it been in the context of their job?” | ||
Brooks: “It says it’s an exclusive…. so it would have figured in morning conference” She says “probably not” as to paying for it. | ||
“It’s clearly not overwhelmingly in the public interest to say Prince William was grief stricken at the funeral… but it was everywhere” | ||
17/11/07 Sun story ‘plotted’ on 16th; “we were getting reports for many years… that things weren’t quite right. Especially the pay.” | ||
“To have a war hero quitting and citing pay would have been of interest to me,” says Brooks of another MOD story | ||
“Never an issues with these stories, never a complaint, or where x was getting these stories,” says Brooks. | ||
BREAKING: Brooks says “we never received one complaint” from MOD or anyone in military about source of stories | ||
‘If it had been put to me a war hero is quitting because he cannot stand treatment of troops…. then yes” says Brooks of paying for this | ||
A Sun article about a “Mucky Major” and sex allegations cited. “It could have come from anywhere,” says Brooks. | ||
As to paying for this: “It contravenes the army act… but probably not,” says Brooks. | ||
Though there’s no confirming authorisation from Brooks to following, Brooks says she would have approved and congratulated Sun journalist | ||
Ten minute break | ||
We’re now on 4th authorisation email around April 2008 from Brooks for Jordan-Barber payments through Thomas Cook | ||
Brooks was in Rome 09/04/08 “We had News Corp interests in Italy… I may have seen it,” says Brooks of another story about female soldier | ||
Again Brooks says there could be many sources to this “long running saga… of this second lieutenant” Brooks said she wouldn’t have paid | ||
Sun article on missing laptop cited: Brooks says “it was a running theme in media…. there was an MI6 employee who left dossier in taxi” | ||
Three thousand pound email seeking authorisation for payment read out: no response from Brooks recorded but she would have authorised | ||
One of the jurors has a faulty bundle with missing pages. | ||
Going through tab 5 now on the fifth email: Brooks away in Germany for first of three articles “we had some musical interests there.” | ||
“We had close links with Bildt,” says Brooks of German trip but she would have still seen this article 03/05/08 about sacking of corporal | ||
“This has two levels of public interest,” says Brooks: “attack on recruit… and there was an issue about post traumatic stress disorder” | ||
Second story on this 5th tab concerns more alleged bullying at Catterick. | ||
Hypothetically Brooks would have paid “In the context of Catterick and Deepcut… it would fit into public interest category” | ||
3rd story on 5th tab is a story about a Gurkha: diary shows Brooks away on 22/05/08 on 40th Birthday and then off to US 28/05/08 for work | ||
Brooks says story could have gone from anywhere but wouldn’t have paid “because the police were involved would have come out anyway” | ||
11/06/08 approval sought for “Thomas Cook” £3k payment for “top military source” and mentions pickups by other media. | ||
Now onto tab 6 and sixth email authorisation and related Sun MOD stories. | ||
Sun article from 17/08/08 article about sailors on cocaine “on high seas” cited. Brooks was at the office. Thinks public interest. | ||
Major feels up privates story from Cyprus 03/10/08 “where army went for decompression” – perhaps would have come out anyway. | ||
Army Gun nut article from Nov 08: diary shows Brooks away from 17/11/08 “I think I did go to Afghanistan in 08” with General Richard Dannatt | ||
Email to Brooks talks of prison contact and an Al Qaeda terrorist training as a stand up comic. | ||
Laidlaw reads out an admission re prison contact: MSC confirms the source was a BACS payment to a journalist | ||
“What would we have done without post-its, and junior barristers,” says Saunders of a note about Jordan-Barber’s maternity leave. | ||
Break till tomorrow till 10.00 a.m. |
Note: All the defendants deny all the charges. The trial continues.
Related Articles
Peter Jukes on ABC Radio
Rebekah Brooks Takes The Stand At Phone Hacking Trial – The Daily Beast
The Brooks Plan B and Blair Unofficial Advisor emails
Half Time at the Phone Hacking Trial
How the Kindness of Strangers crowd funded my Hacking Trial coverage
Previous Posts
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 21 Feb
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 25 Feb
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 26 Feb
Links: The Trial So Far | Full Trial Summary | Indexed Evidence | Breaking News
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 28 Feb | Live Tweeting the hacking trial
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 3 Mar | Live Tweeting the hacking trial
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 4 Mar | Live Tweeting the hacking trial