Wednesday 19 March 2014
Summary | ||
Clive Goodman’s Defence Continues on Green Books and Phone Hacking | ||
Royal Green Books and Telephone Directories | ||
Clive Goodman’s Arrest in 2006 | ||
The “Lone Wolf” | ||
Coulson contacts Goodman after arrest | ||
Goodman downloads emails from NI | ||
Cafe meeting of Coulson and Goodman | ||
Goodman suspended but offered work | ||
Goodman’s Proof of Evidence | ||
NI are given Goodman’s Case Documents | ||
Transcript of conversation between Coulson and Goodman | ||
Meeting between Goodman and NI Lawyer | ||
Goodman pleads Guilty in 2006 | ||
Sentencing Hearing | ||
Goodman Sentenced | ||
Goodman meeting with Brooks 2007 | ||
Goodman’s Second Arrest |
Clive Goodman’s Defence Continues on Green Books and Phone Hacking | ||
Royal Green Books and Telephone Directories | ||
Back at the #hackingtrial – how many times have I typed that? – with Clive Goodman, former NOTW Royal editor, in the witness box | ||
David Spens QC picks up the last topic from yesterday – use of Royal Green Books and Internal Telephone Directories. | ||
Spens turns to the Mulcaire tasking by Miskiw on Sir Michael Peat: Mulcaire’s notes contain all “public reference record” | ||
Clive Goodman’s Arrest in 2006 | ||
Spens now covers the period between Goodman’s arrest 08/08/06 and sentence 26/01/07 | ||
Goodman says he was arrested at 6 am: first taken to News International and then Charing Cross police station. Spoke to his wife. | ||
NI provided a lawyer who “was well known around the office” and “dealt with difficult stories” – Henry Brandman | ||
Goodman went through three interviews on the 08/08/06 and two the next day: he was advised to give “no comment” interviews. | ||
On the third interview, police present a “huge document” on Glenn Mulcaire. Goodman spoke to Brandman during break | ||
“I was quite distraught at the enormity of the file on Glenn’s Mulcaire’s activities,” says Goodman. “I was worried I’d get blamed for all” | ||
Goodman told Henry Brandman “lots of people at the NOTW were doing this… Andy Coulson set up payments to facilitate all this” | ||
The “Lone Wolf” | ||
09/08/07 Goodman spoke to Brandman again about the “breadth of the case and the depth of the evidence” Brandman suggested “a lone wolf” | ||
Goodman says of his lawyer “I had a pretty strong feeling everything I said would go back to News International” | ||
Goodman charged that evening. Brandman told Goodman that Stuart Kuttner would pick him up from police station. | ||
Kuttner asked Goodman about the interviews: was anyone else named? Did he say he was bullied or encouraged by other people. | ||
Kuttner “wanted to know the depth of the investigation and whether other people were involved” says Goodman: concerned by “huge legal bills” | ||
“I was facing a huge trial possibly funded by myself” says Goodman: “I couldn’t afford to do it” | ||
Goodman had all his cards confiscated by police and no cash when he returned home. Kuttner took out £100 and gave it to Goodman’s wife | ||
Next day a NOTW pa arrived with £1000 in cash from Kuttner. | ||
10/08/07 Goodman spoke to Coulson and took a contemporaneous note of the conversation. | ||
Goodman is shown his contemporaneous note to refresh his memory: the jury don’t have these for legal reasons. | ||
Coulson contacts Goodman after arrest | ||
14/03/07 is the date of this “contact report” though Goodman says he made the note around 10/08/07: Coulson phoned Goodman | ||
Coulson first asked about Goodman’s “welfare” and then said “we’re mates but I’m having to suspend you” on full pay, with legal expenses | ||
“Coulson gave the impression that he was having discussions with people in prison or home office and there was no intention I’d be sentenced | ||
Goodman said he told Coulson “the case would go way beyond August 16th” – the initial hearing. Coulson advised him to plead guilty | ||
Coulson said he didn’t know how Goodman “could beat the charges” and “to deal with what was in front of me head on” according to Goodman note | ||
Goodman was ‘disturbed’ by the call: “I’d seen other people in trouble at NOTW… they were a lot more supportive. I was being bounced…” | ||
Goodman then went to Internet cafe to access his NI emails through a new hotmail account. | ||
Goodman says he accessed the emails because “I felt at risk of being parcelled off as Glenn Mulcaire’s only conspirator.” | ||
“To prove Andy knew what was going on,” says Goodman of his email retrieval on 10/08/06 around noon | ||
One of the emails was the Prince Harry Chelsy Davey story: Goodman says wasn’t the result of hacking, but was working on “tight timeline” | ||
Another story Goodman downloaded was about Prince Harry and another woman: he feared NI would shut down is access soon. | ||
Other emails – previously seen by jury – are cited to show Goodman’s attempt to prove he wasn’t a “lone wolf” hacking at NOTW | ||
Goodman downloads emails from NI | ||
11/08/06 Goodman downloaded emails at same Internet cafe through hotmail: “looking for further evidence” others at NOTW worked with Mulcaire | ||
Footers show the date of download of Goodman’s emails: the headers show when the emails were created | ||
BREAKING: Clive Goodman downloaded NI emails after his arrest to “show that Andy knew what was going on” in regards to phone hacking at NOTW | ||
Goodman calls this email download “self protection. I was enormously worried… I was going to be the sole conspirator with Glenn Mulcaire” | ||
Goodman gave these emails to an employment lawyer at Lewis Silkin in 2007 | ||
Goodman says he made contact with Tony Lorenzo, employment solicitor around 14/08/06 because Coulson wanted to talk about “his future” | ||
“I couldn’t ask Henri Brandman, because he was representing NI aswell” says Goodman of contact with Lorenzo | ||
Goodman spoke to Brandman about statements, character witnesses, etc. | ||
BREAKING: Goodman claim his lawyer Henri Brandman raised the topic of him being the “lone wolf” in phone hacking in 2006 | ||
Goodman told Brandman that “the editor raised a string of revenue for the project (Mulcaire) and he didn’t feel comfortable being lone wolf | ||
Cafe meeting of Coulson and Goodman | ||
Goodman met Andy Coulson at Cafe Rouge in Wimbledon | ||
In prior arranged phone call Coulson said “it was a vital conversation – important information to pass on” that weekend. | ||
Coulson was urging Goodman to “get this out of the way” in phone conversation. | ||
“I was very suspicious of the meeting,” says Goodman on 14/08/06 so he recorded it and made a note immediately after. | ||
Goodman says the quality of his tape was “pretty poor… I’m not an undercover reporter”. | ||
Saunders explains the jury won’t have this document Goodman is turning to because of legal privilege. | ||
Meeting 3.20 to 3.55 on 14/08/06 Coulson wanted to talk about criminal case and what would happen. “Police didn’t want to go any deeper” | ||
BREAKING: Goodman says that Coulson said through his “influence” he could stop him going to prison for phone hacking in 2006 | ||
Goodman says that Coulson promised if made clear “he acted alone.. off the reservation” he could get a job back at NOTW on similar salary | ||
“You can be one of those people who come back” Goodman says Coulson promised: “It’s up to you” | ||
Goodman says Coulson promised to pay and help look after Goodman’s family even if he got a custodial sentence | ||
Goodman says he was told “to keep silent about the involvement of others” | ||
Goodman pauses in court when talking about his wife and daughter. | ||
“Andy had a lot of detail about the case… he could only got from Henri Brandman” says Goodman: “a conflict of interest” | ||
“You’ve got to say you’re a lone wolf. That put the fear of god in me. Exactly what NI solicitor said” Goodman tells the jury | ||
16/08/06 Goodman appears in court; “great deal of pressure from Henri to plead guilty” says Goodman. | ||
But this was magistrates court – no possibility of pleading guilty. It has no jurisdiction to deal with Goodman’s ‘conspiracy’ count | ||
Goodman was advised he could still plead guilty at a later date. | ||
David Spens QC reads out legal note about Goodman’s case going to the Crown Court because of conspiracy charge. | ||
Goodman suspended but offered work | ||
31/08/06 Goodman spoke to Coulson again: he has a note of the conversation. | ||
Goodman says Coulson called him at home on 31/08/06: “You are suspended. It’s up to me whether I use you or not” suggested new work | ||
Coulson offered Goodman NOTW work from home on book features, serialisations and Royal stories. Goodman called back and said “yes” | ||
Coulson took the hotmail address from Goodman: contacted him a couple of days later for a story about Earl Spencer and marriage break up | ||
Goodman was also given a couple of book serialisations to work on from Andy Coulson after his arrest. | ||
Goodman says he accepted offer “if I didn’t accept the work I’d be in trouble and salary I was receiving on suspension would probably end” | ||
Goodman’s Proof of Evidence | ||
Goodman produced a “proof of evidence” in the months leading up to his trial in the autumn of 2006 | ||
29/10/06 is date of the legal document Goodman produced on phone hacking (BTW: I store all these dates for later reference) | ||
Goodman says the ‘proof of evidence’ document was constructed by himself: and represents his instructions to Henri Brandman | ||
Spens is going to read this document and section on Mulcaire: | ||
Document explains Mulcaire had worked for news desk for at least 10 years, and reporters not allowed direct access. Payments explained | ||
Goodman’s proof of evidence talks of a CPS file which contained Mulcaire’s contract. | ||
Goodman concedes that his statement is false in regard to knowing about Mulcaire’s phone hacking in 2006 | ||
“He claimed the information came from security service contacts who were already monitoring phone” says Goodman statement | ||
BREAKING: Goodman claims he was introduced to a ‘spook’ by Mulcaire: intelligence service officer who apparently approved of hacking | ||
Goodman’s original legal statement says Mulcaire was paid with full knowledge of editor of NOTW and managing editor. | ||
30/10/06 email from Henri Brandman to Goodman talks of conversation with senior NI exec, and how his barrister will be Kelsey Fry | ||
Goodman replies “other star names” seems to have been added to his indictment “though not a shred of evidence linking me” | ||
“My concern remains that these will all be seen as a general conspiracy… other NI execs also appear on face of Crown papers” Goodman in 06 | ||
Goodman writes again to Brandman about the meeting with barrister Kelsey Fry and says some Mulcaire info “not a topic for email” | ||
Goodman corrects himself: it was actually Henri Brandman who wrote ‘proof of evidence’ before trial. He made amendments. | ||
Crown court hearing for Goodman was set for 07/11/06 | ||
On 02/11/06 Goodman amends his 5 page do: “this was to inform Henri Brandman and Kelsey Fry of everyone involved with Glenn Mulcaire | ||
“Knowledge of his work became so widely known that the editor told conference no more reference to him” Goodman legal doc on Mulcaire in 06 | ||
Goodman legal doc again mentions intelligence officer introduced to him by Mulcaire suggesting his “operations were sanctioned” | ||
Goodman says he was unaware in 2005 that Mulcaire was on a separate £2k a month contract with NOTW. | ||
Goodman legal statement in October 2006 explains he had to make transcripts of voicemails for senior NOTW editors | ||
Goodman emails his lawyer Henri Brandman on same date in October 2006 about arrangements with senior NI execs inspecting his legal papers | ||
Goodman turns to a 03/11/06 legal document, not seen by the jury, about a meeting with his lawyer Henri Brandman | ||
Goodman gave Brandman a new copy of his “proof” and discussed progress of his case | ||
“Judges might take a benign view of someone who took responsibility for their actions” Goodman says Brandman told him. | ||
Goodman says NI was influencing his legal advice “I was getting their point of view through my solicitors… didn’t know what to make of it” | ||
NI are given Goodman’s Case Documents | ||
03/11/06 Coulson emails senior NI exec about Goodman allowing them to see his legal case, and getting copies for the weekend. | ||
Goodman says he didn’t want to “upset” Coulson, and made “encouraging noises” about providing his legal documents. | ||
“I absolutely didn’t want a set of prosecution documents going to NOTW,” says Goodman. “I didn’t trust them… newspapers leaky places” | ||
More internal NI email to Coulson about ‘Clive’ not wanting to share prosecution documents with NOTW and NI execs | ||
NI exec writes Goodman reluctance on documents “not good” and Clive being “difficult” about “Kelsey should know this but not that syndrome” | ||
Goodman says he wasn’t being difficult. | ||
04/11/06 note after meeting with Brandman promising to provide details on Glenn Mulcaire, and stressing NI can only read his docs in office | ||
More emails between Brandman and NI execs show Goodman’s legal team passing on prosecution case. | ||
BREAKING: Goodman’s lawyer defied his direct instructions and passed on prosecution phone hacking papers to News International | ||
Goodman confirmed he never changed his instructions to Henri Brandman about sharing papers with NI execs. | ||
Goodman shakes his head at emails sent from his lawyer to News International and says “I never saw these papers at the time” | ||
04/11/06 Meeting with Goodman, Brandman, Kelsey Fry and senior NI executive. | ||
BREAKING: Goodman says he was told by NI exec: “You’re not going to be dismissed as long as you don’t implicate other people” | ||
At legal meeting, NI exec told Goodman “Andy would deny any involvement or responsiblity” for phone hacking | ||
15 minute break | ||
Transcript of conversation between Coulson and Goodman | ||
Back after the break at the #hackingtrial: Clive Goodman is explaining events after his arrest for phone hacking in 2006 | ||
08/11/06 a transcript of conversation the day after legal conference between Goodman and Coulson: Langdale for Coulson says it’s 09/11/06 | ||
Goodman recorded the conversation when at home: Coulson was at the NOTW offices. Goodman “very concerned” after meeting NI lawyer | ||
Spens takes Goodman to a part in the transcript: Coulson says “there was one thing at that meeting… passed on…. I need to clarify” | ||
Goodman says he had two meeting with NI lawyer – one at Brandman’s chamber, and another at Carluccio’s after this time. | ||
Back to transcript: Coulson says: “this idea it’s a foregone conclusion you’re going to be dismissed” and refers back to Cafe Rouge meeting | ||
Transcript of Coulson tape (heard before) reiterates “as the editor, the intention is…. to give you every possible support” | ||
Coulson says in this recorded conversation from 2006: “my absolute intention is to say…. we’re going to continue to employ you” | ||
Coulson says: “The best way for me to argue that is to say I have a duty of care for you…. That’s not for me. That’s for you” | ||
“You need looking after, and that’s what we will do.” says Coulson: “I’m assuming continuing to work at NOTW is something you want” | ||
Coulson talks about “subbing” jobs for Goodman, and “retraining” in recorded conversation. | ||
“We are on the same side here,” says Coulson to Goodman. “It’s really up to you… The truth is we’re not there” | ||
“We both agree that going forward you know your role now becomes a very difficult one” says Coulson to Goodman. | ||
Goodman says “I didn’t believe I’d retain a job at this period” despite guarantees of employment from Andy Coulson just prior to trial | ||
Meeting between Goodman and NI Lawyer | ||
Spens shows jury another police transcript between Goodman and NI lawyer that took place at pub in Putney on 08/11/06 | ||
Goodman recorded this meeting with NI lawyer was “very relaxed chat about family and former colleagues” | ||
Discussions with Coulson relayed back to Goodman: he would deny any involvement in Alexander project, and mitigation plea | ||
Goodman discussed his plea for ‘mitigation’. NI lawyer told him: “There was place for me at the paper if I kept other people out of it” | ||
Most of this taped conversation with NI lawyer and Goodman are “unintelligble” Goodman apologises: “I’m not an undercover reporter” | ||
One audible piece of recording, the NI lawyer says: “Andy knew you had a source in the area…. but he didn’t know what was going on” | ||
Transcript of NI lawyer says Coulson still confident he can offer Goodman job. | ||
Transcript shows NI lawyer discussing with Goodman what his barrister Kelsey Fry will say in court about Mulcaire payments. | ||
Goodman explained to NI lawyer police evidence of other hacking: “Andy’s real problem is that he’s got three executives past and present” | ||
Goodman says he was referring to Miskiw and Thurlbeck and another over those “three executives” | ||
NI lawyer explains Coulson’s three responsibilities: to Goodman, to the paper NOTW, and to himself. | ||
Goodman says there was ‘no sentiment’ in Coulson – referring to the decay of their previous friendship during his editorship of NOTW. | ||
Goodman tells lawyer he was “trying to stay out of prison” and that he was going to be unemployable: some job offers over subbing. | ||
“As long as I don’t have to work with Neil or Ian” says Goodman of future NOTW employment. | ||
27/11/06 email to Coulson from NI lawyer subject ‘Clive” saying Goodman wants to meet his barrister and solicitor alone. | ||
Email describes Goodman as being “devastated” over enlargement of prosecution claims. | ||
“I felt he’d be a malign influence who’d report everything back to the editor” says Goodman of attendance of this NI lawyer. | ||
Goodman confirms conference took place with only his solictior, Brandman and barrister Kelsey Fry. | ||
Goodman says he told Kelsey Fry about others involvement with Mulcaire: “He echoed the advice Henri Brandman gave me” Goodman says. | ||
Kelsey Fry told Goodman that the judge may take a “dim view” of involving others at NOTW in a plea of mitigation. | ||
Goodman says that by 20/11/06 they’d had all the prosecution documents: “completely transparent… linking Miskiw, Thurlbeck to Mulcaire” | ||
“It was quite clear the police had made a decision to stop at me” says Goodman despite evidence of other NOTW contacts with Mulcaire. | ||
“Despite this evidence” says Goodman, “nobody wanted to take it any further.” Says he had no choice but accept legal advice to say nothing | ||
Goodman pleads Guilty in 2006 | ||
29/11/06 Goodman came to Old Bailey and pleaded guilty to conspiracy to hack voicemails. | ||
11/12/06 is a “proof number three” – third draft of Goodman’s case. | ||
Five minute break to get photocopies of missing Goodman document | ||
Back after a break to copy missing papers at Court 12 | ||
In this third draft of Goodman’s legal ‘proof’: “no mention of other NOTW executives” except brief reference to payments system | ||
Goodman’s evidence about other NOTW executives ‘disappeared’ from legal proofs drafted by his lawyer. | ||
Goodman says this was a result of his previous conversation with lawyers: he “rather doubtfully” agreed to suppress other NOTW names. | ||
11/12/06 Goodman says to Brandman he cannot accept the proof as a final document. Wants Kelsey Fry’s view on payment structure. | ||
Goodman says he concerned “there was little separation between me and Mulcaire… and didn’t make point I couldn’t approve his payments” | ||
Sentencing Hearing | ||
12/12/06 Another conference at Kelsey Fry’s chambers with Brandman: an NI lawyer “had invited himself” says Goodman. | ||
Meeting with lawyers was to discuss sentencing hearing: scheduled for 26/01/07 with plea for mitigation and meeting with probation before | ||
Goodman says NI lawyer asked to attend because “he had special insight into probation service” – Goodman agree to part attendance | ||
Goodman says he managed to have a discussion with Kelsey Fry about payments – told to stick to “existing line” not mentioning others at NOTW | ||
Goodman says NI lawyer intervened in discussions with his lawyers, about dismissal. | ||
BREAKING: Goodman told by NI lawyer “Andy would only take him back” if he didn’t name “others” in contact with Mulcaire in sentencing plea | ||
That evening, Goodman emailed Brandman complaining NI lawyer’s presence was “most unhelpful” | ||
Goodman says NI lawyer promised to talk about probation and Sarah’s Law: found his “stick and carrot” approach quite “shocking” | ||
Goodman writes to his lawyer Brandman about being more “threatened” by NI than “by prosecution case” | ||
Back with Goodman after lunch at #hackingtrial | ||
David Spens QC adduces the pre sentencing report provided by probation officer for sentencing judge: Goodman met probation 26/12/06 16/01/07 | ||
Probation report says Goodman expressed “contrition” and had previous good relationship with the palace. | ||
“He knew he was taking extreme risks, but had been demoted… sidelined… his senior editor constantly berating him’ says Probation Report | ||
Probation report also talks about financial approvals for Mulcaire: he only wanted to “curry favour with his boss…. lowering status at NI” | ||
Probation report says Goodman seemed to have no financial gain, and that cash payments to Mulcaire facilitated by newspaper | ||
Spens picks up the “tacit agreement” with editor over Mulcaire payments. Goodman says he didn’t say ‘tacit’ and he named Coulson. | ||
Goodman explains he was still “very worried” and knew probation report would not to go NI: “it was my way of telling someone in authority” | ||
BREAKING: Goodman says he used probation officer to convey to judge the editorial approval of his activities with Mulcaire. | ||
Internal NI email between lawyer and Coulson about Goodman’s meeting with probation officer saying “Who knew?” never arose | ||
“Anything I told Henri would go back to NOTW” says Goodman of not informing his lawyer about probation officer report. | ||
15/01/07 NI lawyer emails Coulson about Goodman’s movements and trying to meet up with him. 16/01/07 2nd meeting with probation officer | ||
17/01/07 Goodman emails his lawyer Henri Brandman discussing Mulcaire and his weekly payments | ||
Goodman explains in email he was “concerned about the lack of distinction between the other account and (Mulcaire’s) other activities. | ||
23/01/07 Goodman emails Brandman thanking him for fax of information report: “I’d like only, you, me and Kelsey to receive copies” | ||
“It would be extremely unhelpful for NOTW to see this document” writes Goodman. Didn’t want them to know he’d named editor in probation rpt | ||
Goodman sentenced in Jan 2007, and no mention in mitigation of “approval of editor… or involvement of any other NOTW executives” | ||
Goodman Sentenced | ||
Goodman sentenced for four months in prison in January 2007 | ||
05/02/07 Goodman was sent a letter that his employment with NOTW was terminated. He was in prison. His wife called to tell him of letter. | ||
08/02/07 £70k paid into Goodman’s account. His 100k salary minus National Insurance ect. | ||
Jury shown letter from new NOTW editor Colin Myler 22/02/07 writing to PCC over “single rogue reporter” | ||
Goodman was given early release on a ‘tag’ in late Feb 2007 | ||
02/03/07 Goodman appeals against his dismissal for gross misconduct to Daniel Cloke at News Internataional. | ||
He appeals on 1/ Mulcaire activities supported by Coulson and others, paid by Kuttner 2/ Miskiw and Thurlbeck also hacking. | ||
“This practice was widely discussed at daily editorial conference” says Goodman in 2007 email to News International | ||
Goodman says in 2007 NI lawyer had long advance notice he was to be plead guilty, and NOTW continued to employ him. | ||
Goodman writes in 2007 he was promised employment if he didn’t implicate others in phone hacking and Mulcaire. Letter cc’ed to Les Hinton | ||
14/03//07 Goodman wrote to Cloke before internal NI appeals procedure. | ||
Spens turns back to a 04/01/07 email in which NI lawyer talks of the ‘who knew’ topic. | ||
The second letter to Cloke asked “for assistance… for my appeal” and asks for postponing the hearing | ||
Goodman says he wants to be accompanied by lawyer for the NI hearing, and asks for further documents: sentencing hearing transcription | ||
Goodman also asks for all his payment requests from 2005 and which executives had approved | ||
Goodman tells jury “it was important to show who could authorise payments”: he also asked for evidence of his demotion. | ||
Goodman also asked for emails from him to Coulson, Kuttner & other senior NOTW execs: “I knew for a fact stories… involved phone hacking” | ||
Goodman wanted NOTW internal emails for employment tribunal concerning himself, Mulcaire and the ‘Alexander Payments’ | ||
Goodman also wanted internal emails from NI lawyer to find out contact with his legal team | ||
14/03/07 Harbottle and Lewis instructed to find emails related to the matters Goodman raised. | ||
20/03/07 Date of first internal appeal with Goodman: Daniel Cloke and Colin Myler supervised NI hearing | ||
NI “declined” to allow Goodman to bring a lawyer to appeal. Goodman asked if he could record meeting “they said no” “recorded it anyway” | ||
“I didn’t trust them to provide any accurate record of events” says Goodman of taping appeal. NI transcript errors “reversed the truth” | ||
Goodman counted 47 inaccuracies in NI transcript of appeal. He submitted his own downloaded emails, including voicemail transcripts | ||
NI appeal did not call any witnesses, says Goodman. | ||
30/03/07 email adduced from Goodman to Lorenzo, his employment lawyer. Spens asks Goodman to read it to himself | ||
Goodman meeting with Brooks 2007 | ||
30/03/07 Goodman gets a call from a reporter at the Sun: “I knew him very well”… calling on behalf of “Rebekah who wanted meeting with me” | ||
Goodman met Brooks at the RAC club 12/04/07 | ||
Goodman make a ‘contact note’ of this meeting with Brooks. | ||
Brooks offered Goodman employment on bookazines about the Royal Family, to co write with veteran Sun Royal photographer. | ||
Brooks says she didn’t want to get involved in “process” with NOTW. Goodman expressed a lot of doubt because Hinton had sacked him | ||
Brooks insisted she could employ who she liked. They discussed salaries: not a job but a contract for a period of time. | ||
Email from Goodman to Lorenzo with contract sent by Brooks’ PA offering £12.5k for six months. “I felt it wasn’t serious job offer” | ||
Goodman felt that after six months “my threat as whistleblower over phone hacking would be over” | ||
09/05/07 email from Brooks adduced in court, chasing him up on bookazine and sub-editors training course and asking him to ‘return a call’ | ||
10/05/07 second internal NI hearing at the hotel in Surbiton – first one at NI’s magazine division in Chelsea: Cloke and Myler in attendance | ||
Goodman covertly recorded this appeal hearing too. | ||
Goodman was told NI were “minded to reject the appeal” on 10/05/07 | ||
18/05/07 Brooks writes to Goodman again on the “sub editor” job “we will get you a contract” | ||
30/05/07 NI officially rejects Goodman’s internal appeal for unfair dismissal. Discussed with Lorenzo whether to go to full public tribunal | ||
03/06/07 Goodman was called previously by John Chapman, head of corporate legal for NI seeking “a without prejudice discussion” | ||
Chapman emails Goodman’s solicitor on 07/06/07 with a proposal. | ||
“We would be prepared to offer your client £50k to settle any employment claim” says Chapman: no proposal for future work services | ||
Between 07/06/07 and early July a compromise agreement signed by Goodman and News International (NGN in this case) | ||
“The employer with pay the employee… the sum of £140k” says contract. “Over and above £70k paid previously” says Spens. | ||
This contract between Goodman and NI had a confidentiality clause attached. Money paid on 10/07/07 and 31/10/07 | ||
Goodman’s Second Arrest | ||
Last chapter of Goodman’s evidence in chief. His arrest in July 2013. He gave a no comment interview on advice of solicitor. | ||
Goodman said he “read about my arrest in the Guardian newspaper” before it happened. Police turned up a dawn with search warrant. | ||
More reports on arrest not naming Goodman seemed to “have everything” on Green Books: “only coming from inside inquiry” | ||
“There was a serious leak in police inquiry… doubly encouraged me to make no comment” in police interviews says Goodman. | ||
On second arrest Goodman made a statement about Royal Directories and says they were anonymous cash payments to protect sources. | ||
Goodman says “there was no corruption of public officers or the police” in prepared statement on second arrest. Then made no comment | ||
23/11/12 Goodman charges with two counts to commit misconduct in public office. | ||
Originally Goodman was going to stand trial alone with Mr Coulson on counts 2 and 3: then that was attached to hacking trial. | ||
In August 2013 Goodman waived his legal privilege from Brandman, Kelsey Fry and Lorenzo: files were disclosed to all parties in the case | ||
Last question for Goodman from Spens about Coulson. | ||
Goodman explains “initially I was pretty sore” about imprisonment and then loss of job: “but you can’t stay like that forever” | ||
“I don’t have any feelings about it all now” says Goodman. He says the anger had “faded” when he got out of prison: “a good place to think” | ||
“I wish we could have got on with our lives, but it didn’t happen. I have to say things that pained me in the course of my defence” Goodman | ||
Half an hour break for papers to be prepared . | ||
Jury sent home early to allow other defence teams to prepare to cross examine Goodman |
Note: All the defendants deny all the charges. The trial continues.
Related Articles
Mulcaire Sanctioned by Spooks – Malign Influence of NI Lawyer on Goodmans Legal Team
Texts to Rebekah Brooks from Tony Blair on the Eve of her Arrest
Brooks – Coulson email exchange on Goodman Mulcaire guilty pleas: It is all going so well
Peter Jukes on ABC Radio
Rebekah Brooks Takes The Stand At Phone Hacking Trial – The Daily Beast
Previous Posts
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 13 Mar
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 17 Mar
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 18 Mar
Links: The Trial So Far | Full Trial Summary | Indexed Evidence | Breaking News
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 20 Mar | Live Tweeting the hacking trial
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 25 Mar | Live Tweeting the hacking trial
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 26 Mar | Live Tweeting the hacking trial