Tuesday 18 March 2014
Summary | ||
Clive Goodman’s Defence Continues on Phone Hacking | ||
Goodman questioned on Phone Hacking | ||
Hacking of Royal Phones | ||
Goodman’s first knowledge of Glen Mulcaire | ||
The Goodman and Mulcaire Project | ||
Goodman says he told Andy Coulson about the Royal Phone Project | ||
Transcript of Prince Harry voicemail message | ||
Goodman downloads emails after arrest | ||
Prince William Shot Story | ||
Payments to Glen Mulcaire | ||
The Editor’s Conferences | ||
Prince Harry and Chelsy Davy Story | ||
Prince William Training Exercise Story |
Clive Goodman’s Defence Continues on Phone Hacking | ||
Goodman questioned on Phone Hacking | ||
Back at the #hackingtrial after a rather manic morning – walked all the way from Piccadilly in 20 mins. Faster than the traffic. | ||
We’re continuing with the third day (two half days so far) with Clive Goodman, former NOTW Royal Editor, in the witness box | ||
Goodman is being questioned by his counsel, David Spens QC. He’s now moving onto the subject of phone hacking at NOTW | ||
Spens reiterates the guilty pleas from Goodman in 2007: which covered four Royal Aide phone hacking victims from November 2005 | ||
Spens points out that the timeline of actual hacks shows new victims, and hacking preceding November 2005 | ||
Hacking of Royal Phones | ||
Spens turns to the transcript from a microcassette found at Goodman’s home from Prince William and Kate Middleton dated 23/02/06 | ||
“Hopefully I should be able to leave by 7 at the latest,” says Prince William to Kate Middleton about leaving Sandhurst in 2006 | ||
Goodman explains this was originally recorded by Glenn Mulcaire and read down the phone to him. | ||
Spens moves onto the timeline of hacking Lord Frederick Windsor. | ||
Spens cites a 26/04/06 email from Goodman to other NOTW staff subject ‘Fred”: details employment and DOB. Looking for an address. | ||
Goodman says the information about Windsor was all in the public domain: as Royal Reporter Goodman was first port of call. | ||
“I know there was an investigation into Frederic Windsor…. brought in by Coulson, who had an encounter with Windsor early one morning” | ||
Goodman says Maz Mahmoud was going to be involved in The Lord Frederick Windsor investigation, instigated by Andy Coulson. | ||
26/04/06 Goodman being asked about names for Windsor. NOTW journo emails Mr Gadd who provides address and phone number | ||
Goodman says he never hacked Lord Frederick Windsor‘s mobile phone. | ||
“It did start before 1st of November” says Spens of Goodman’s phone hacking and notes Mark Dyer and Tom Parker Bowles missing from list | ||
“I pleaded guilty to the allegations that were put to me,’ says Goodman. “I didn’t know it was illegal… I didn’t know it was against code” | ||
The Code is the PCC code of conduct: Goodman says it was however unethical and underhand. | ||
Goodman’s first knowledge of Glen Mulcaire | ||
Goodman says he first encountered Mulcaire as a contact of Greg Miskiw | ||
Miskiw was news editor at NOTW, or deputy, at the time. | ||
05/10/00 Miskiw was Deputy Editor News and Investigations: went to Manchester in 18/09/03: Goodman aware of Mulcaire before move | ||
Miskiw leftt NOTW in 30/06/05 for a new life in the North. “Greg was very much in control of Mulcaire… to very last day” says Goodman | ||
“Glenn Mulcaire I knew to be PI and inquiry agent, gradually he became the only inquiry agent the news desk used” says Goodman | ||
Goodman says Mulcaire’s reputation was to “crack almost impossible stories” | ||
Goodman says initially he never met Mulcaire, and took messages on phone. Aware of what he did. | ||
“If you’re on a big story, Greg would ask details, make inquiries, and come back with information” says Goodman | ||
Miskiw would ask for names and addresses: “Not all Glenn Mulcaire’s were phone hacking. He made legitimate inquiries too” | ||
Goodman says another Ray Chapman would provide details from company records and registers in legitimate fashion. | ||
Goodman says in “early 2000s” Miskiw approached Goodman for contacts around William and Harry: Goodman named Dyer and Asprey | ||
Miskiw would come “back with pieces of information” about Asprey, Dyer and the Royal Princes. This was around 2002, Goodman says. | ||
Goodman explains Miskiw was “pretty senior” and he “wouldn’t have got far” if he queried how info provided on Royals was used. | ||
Goodman says around January 2005 Miskiw told him what Mulcaire “had been doing” with DDNs and PIN numbers for Asprey and Dyer | ||
“I knew what he was doing” says Goodman: “I realised there were voicemails, but I didn’t have direct contact with Mulcaire” | ||
“I think he found the continuing monitoring of voicemails tiresome,” says Goodman of Miskiw: “and wanted to download work on me” | ||
14/01/05 Miskiw emails Goodman about Asprey having reset her PIN number on her phone. | ||
Three months later; Miskiw to Goodman “call urgent re Asprey”: Goodman doesn’t remember full context of this email | ||
Goodman explains that change of PIN number left “me to no access to voicemails” and he had no direct access to Mulcaire – went to Miskiw | ||
01/10/05 change of staff at NOTW. Mulcaire no longer Miskiw’s. Big “power struggle over who had control of this asset” says Goodman. | ||
Saunders establishes that Miskiw had left NOTW, but “was still running Mulcaire thought NOTW was paying for him” in 2005 | ||
The Goodman and Mulcaire Project | ||
Goodman says Mulcaire phoned in him last week of October 2005 approx 14/10/05 | ||
Mulcaire was “pretty sore because NOTW was trying to cut his budget by £500 and was looking to make up this shortfall” says Goodman | ||
Mulcaire offered Goodman a “project: to provide DDNs for three people close to Prince William and Harry” in October 2005 | ||
Evidence shows Mulcaire was receiving full 2k a month at that time despite what he told Goodman. | ||
Mulcaire’s project was that Goodman would provide the names: he would provide PINs and DDN’s for £500 per week. | ||
Asprey, Lowther Pinkerton and Harveson were the targets of this new “project” says Goodman | ||
BREAKING: Goodman claims that Glenn Mulcaire had contacts with security services who were monitoring the Royals | ||
But Goodman says he has no way of knowing whether Mulcaire’s claims were accurate. | ||
Goodman says he could “monitor events in the life of the Prince of Wales’ sons” from the Mulcaire info: “very useful” | ||
Goodman says “if a PIN number went down” Mulcaire could get a new one. But he couldn’t put Royal messages into context with background info | ||
Goodman says he thought about the Mulcaire proposal: but he had not budget of his own to pay “effectively a foot soldier” | ||
Goodman says he told Andy Coulson about the Royal Phone Project | ||
BREAKING: Goodman says he told Andy Coulson about Mulcaire’s project to “monitor three Royal phones” through hacking for £500 per week. | ||
Goodman says he told Coulson there was a suggestion info came from security services at the time. | ||
Goodman says until this point Coulson had not known Goodman was hacking. | ||
Goodman says there was a discussion about putting the Mulcaire project through editorial mgt budget, so not seen as ‘poaching’ from news | ||
Goodman says: “the editor approved a two month trial to see what would come out”. | ||
Goodman says he would make “creative identity” for payments to Mulcaire. He didn’t have a conversation with Kuttner. Coulson would have done | ||
Spens goes through the ‘Alexander’ payments to Mulcaire: the first processed 30/10/05 with £500 being paid 09/11/05 for “Goodman TXT” | ||
“All of the £500 payments came out of managerial editorial budget” says Spens. Goodman confirms. | ||
Goodman explains how filled in contributor request form in name of Alexander, signed by Kuttner or staff, taken to cashiers. No receipt. | ||
Goodman says he spoke to Mulcaire three of four times a week, and that other NOTW “were hacking phones pretty industriously” | ||
Goodman says he was also told by Mulcaire that Coulson’s phone would be hacked so NOTW journo would know other’s stories. | ||
Goodman also explains Mulcaire said he’d been told to hack Rebekah Brooks phone by another NOTW journalist – she was editor of the Sun | ||
“If he thought anything was interesting he would tape record them” says Goodman of Mulcaire’s phone hacking. | ||
Goodman explains hacking produced some pretty good stories: Coulson was interested in them as were other senior NOTW staff | ||
Goodman says Coulson and others took particular interest in the Harry homework Sandhurst exam story. | ||
Goodman says NOTW staff also took interest in a story about drunkeness at Harry’s passing out ceremony at Sandhurt | ||
Goodman explains he’d talk to editor about “a big story” but otherwise through “normal way” | ||
Goodman says he concealed hacking of Royals from other NOTW staff because of Mulcaire ownership “it was a territorial combative department” | ||
Goodman says the 2 month project of hacking Royal Aides actually lasted ten months – to the moment he was arrested. | ||
24/01/03 email from Goodman to Coulson about ‘Carvery’ “gossip column started by Andy for me to write” – two weeks after Coulson made editor | ||
Carvery column mooted since June 2001: “irreverent and spiky… about show business, politicians… Royalty… Andy took great interest” | ||
Email from Goodman talks about ‘M’ – not Mulcaire but Mark Bolland. | ||
24/01/03 later the same day, Goodman emails Coulson about talking to Mark Bolland and Peat: “Greg’s people turning mobile numbers” | ||
Goodman says “turning” means finding addresses – not phone hacking. | ||
06/02/03 Goodman email to other NOTW staff: “now have his mobile so we can check out that end of it” | ||
Goodman explains how “nothing was happening” in this story and was being driven by boss: “this was just to give us breathing space” | ||
“Worse thing you can tell,” says Goodman NOTW staff, “was that nothing was happening” | ||
02/04/03 email from Goodman talks about Peat talking to Prince Charles and mobiles: Goodman says this was not about hacking. | ||
22/01/05 email from Goodman to Coulson about Paddy Harverson and Prince Harry and “health inf’ from doctor. “Scanned from Helen Asprey” | ||
“This was the voicemail of Helen Asprey’s mobile phone” explains Goodman of two injuries that were affecting Harry’s Sandhurst career | ||
“Andy didn’t know about hacking at this stage” says Goodman of the Asprey email talking of “scanning”. | ||
David Spens QC goes to back to email from 16/08/05 from Coulson asking for Good story. 20/08/05 criticises Blackadder column | ||
Coulson email says Blackadder off the pace with pieces on Billy Bragg and Rod Liddle. | ||
Goodman explains how Mark Bolland, deputy private secretary to Prince of Wales, started the Blackadder column. | ||
“Became troublesome” says Goodman of Bolland: copy not always on time, so Goodman started ghost writing Blackadder for him before he left. | ||
10/09/05 Goodman emails Coulson about Harry at a wedding “To be honest I’d rather be at Jordan’s”: Coulson replies how did we get this? | ||
Goodman says they got that comment of Harry’s by eavesdropping at wedding, not phone hacking. | ||
Goodman explains about Coulson’s bold and caps in email: “the higher you get up the tree the bigger the font” | ||
Harry wedding anecdote actually provided by lip-readers. | ||
25/10/05 email from Goodman “updating Andy on a project” and 2 stories for Tuesday List. Complaints Goodman didn’t go to morning conference | ||
Goodman talks about getting a “green light” for the Alexander Project – i.e. Mulcaire hacking Royal Aides on the day of this email | ||
David Spens QC turns to the “private wire” schedule which shows Lowther Pinkerton hacked 26/10/05 – the following day. | ||
28/10/05 Goodman emails about the “new project getting results” and Lowther Pinkerton in “meltdown… getting stuffed by rest of household” | ||
Goodman says this email to Coulson was ‘Alexander’ project – ie. Mulcaire. Coulson replies “Pop in” | ||
Goodman says he discussed with Coulson the Alexander project “how it was going and whether it could actually produce a story” | ||
30/10/05 timeline shows payment to Mulcaire for £500 | ||
22/11/05 Three weeks later. Goodman emails other NOTW staff about “intelligence in Verbier” about ski trip for Royals. | ||
Goodman emails “I’ve only got stuff I can’t talk to you about on open floor…. I’ll email you from editor’s conference” | ||
Goodman explains this wasn’t about hacking but a “one fact story… you couldn’t talk about it because it would leak” | ||
25/11/05 Goodman to Coulson about “expanding the Matey file”: Goodman says Matey was Glenn Mulcaire | ||
Coulson responds: “Another month?” Goodman “Okeydokey… Stuart not around today. Want to do a leader chat later this afternoon?” | ||
Goodman says he was offering to write leader: Coulson; “I’ll do them tomorrow with SK” | ||
06/12/05 Goodman emails Lowther Pinkerton invited to security conference but because “squeaky nature of information” can’t discuss openly | ||
Goodman says he wouldn’t discuss this on open floor “because it was a result of a hack… and it would leak” | ||
Goodman says he needed to conceal use of Mulcaire and hacking from rival NOTW journos because of territorial rivalry. | ||
Transcript of Prince Harry voicemail message | ||
Jury shown a transcript from Goodman of a conversation between Lowther Pinkerton and Harry concealed as x and y | ||
Transcript of Prince Harry message to Lowther Pinkerton talks about being on guard duty, and coming second in a run, other cadets, and sleep | ||
The Prince Harry transcript asks his private secretary about “inf” on siege of Iranian Embassy for a Sandhurst paper. | ||
Another transcript shown to jury, this time made by police from a microcassette recovered from Goodman’s home on his arrest in 2006 | ||
Goodman says Mulcaire played message to him: he then accessed message and taped it, and then transcribed Harry voicemail | ||
Goodman says he was at the NOTW offices when he made his transcript. He handed this to Lewis Silberman his employment solicitors | ||
Goodman says he needed transcript “to show editor Andy Coulson… to assess how strong this information was” on Harry and Sandhurst exam | ||
08/09/05 Coulson emails Goodman “have you stood it up” – reference to Prince Harry story says Goodman, who’d shown Coulson transcript | ||
About 40 mins later Coulson replies “we are about a million miles away from stand this up as far as I can see”. Goodman forwards to others | ||
Goodman replies to another Coulson is “completely” aware of the facts and wanted to “steam in… concerned how to stand it up” | ||
Goodman says that other NOTW staff concerned he had gone behind their back to talk to editor. | ||
09/09/05 Goodman emails Coulson on ‘Harry’ and “sample copy… going to hit the private sec tomorrow… then Clarence House, then MOD” | ||
“As we know it is 100 percent fact” writes Goodman to Coulson: “Because we’ve seen the transcript” says Goodman | ||
“I think that’s too precise to go unnoticed” says Goodman email about Sandhurst: the plan was to lose “hacking’ in other “inaccurate info” | ||
Sample copy labelled Exclusive by Goodman: ‘essays’ rather than ‘essay” “used to disguise” voicemail hacking. | ||
09/09/05 same Friday: Goodman emails other NOTW staff who had also seen the transcript. | ||
10/09/09 Goodman emails Coulson and other NOTW staff about a contact of Maruchak’s who had been through Sandhurst about essays. | ||
10/09/05 Goodman emails others on Harry Tale “boss… felt last night not a clear cut breach” | ||
Same email chain shows Lowther Pinkerton and Paddy Harveson being called about rules of Sandhurst exams. | ||
Same email chain asks “What does Andy think now?” Coulson asks what’s happening on the story. Goodman replies about “calls” and “tapes” | ||
Goodman says these “tapes” are calls to the Palace for comment | ||
“I can’t press forward on that with exposing the source” says Goodman email to Coulson about standing up Harry story. | ||
“As we know Harry wasn’t just asking for books or websites” says Goodman email to Coulson “a different thing altogether” | ||
More internal NOTW emails cited trying to stand up Harry Sandhurst exam story by calling Clarence House. | ||
Goodman downloads emails after arrest | ||
10/09/05 email forwarded on 10/08/06 by Goodman to himself – two days after his arrest for phone hacking. | ||
“I was very concerned I was going to be left high and dry for all the phone hacking activities at NOTW,” says Goodman. | ||
“I downloaded as many emails as I could remember about phone hacking at the time” says Goodman of Internet cafe visit after his arrest | ||
More emails from 10/09/05 from Coulson to Goodman “can you get someone on the record saying what a disgrace this is” | ||
Jury shown 18/12/05 Blackadder column about Prince Harry and Sandhurst exams appears in NOTW. | ||
Goodman explains that Coulson and others didn’t feel “there was serious enough proof…. so they downgraded to a gossip column story” | ||
Jury shown payments to Mulcaire for payments for the Harry story. | ||
Half an hour break BTW. And working through lunch. Finish at 2 today | ||
Back after a semi lunch break. Trial concludes at 2.30 today not 2pm. | ||
Spens wants to talk about “Prince William‘s Secret Party” as a “sub-topic” of phone hacking | ||
06/01/06 email and a source says there was a secret party the previous night organised by Kate Middleton. Sent to Goodman. | ||
Goodman replies “there was a private reception with champagne” and “definitely” a secret party and sweet speech to Kate from Prince William | ||
08/01/06 NOTW pays £1k for “Hacking by Glenn Mulcaire” for “my adorable Kate” party speech story. | ||
11/01/06 Goodman writes to Coulson about “Kate pics’ and “new source… we’ll be getting more from him during the week” | ||
Goodman says “this was Mulcaire under new arrangement” – the Alexander Project. | ||
15/01/06 NOTW edition following email, payments for Kate snaps based on hacking says Goodman | ||
“You can’t hack a photograph,” points out Saunders. Goodman explains how Prince William was allowed to have photos on bedside at Sandhurst. | ||
Prince William Shot Story | ||
Next sub topic: William Shot Story, explains David Spens QC | ||
Jury shown transcript made by police of voicemail message left by Prince William on Kate Middleton‘s phone. | ||
Prince William talks about “nearly being shot” with blanks during training exercise in message to Middleton | ||
27/01/06 Goodman emails Coulson on “matey’s results… getting stronger and stronger, especially since William started at Sandhurst” | ||
Goodman email to Coulson continues with story of William getting shot and captured during an army night exercise and ambush. | ||
Blackadder column for 29/01/06 – two days after email – has the William Shot story | ||
29/01/06 £250 NOTW payment to Mulcaire for William shot story. “Hacking, initially by Mulcaire… think there was a voicemail to J L-P” | ||
Payments to Glen Mulcaire | ||
Email forwarded by Goodman to himself on 10/08/06 after arrest – actually dated 03/02/06 – Goodman writes to Coulson about “mateys’ payments | ||
Goodman email to Coulson on 03/02/06 explains the value of Mulcaire’s work in turns of lineage and connections” way into the black on this” | ||
“We are the only paper getting any information about his movements and Kate’s movements” writes Goodman of Mulcaire on Prince William | ||
Goodman explains Coulson that Mulcaire could go to another paper, and he’s “not a hack, he doesn’t understand what is and isn’t a story” | ||
“A few weeks ago you asked me to find new ways of getting into the family… and I came up with this: it’s safe productive… a goldmine” | ||
Goodman explains “Coulson thought I was underperforming… to find ways of engaging with younger members of the famliy” | ||
Spens goes back to August 2005 emails with Coulson writing “I need a story this week, Clive, something of substance” | ||
20/08/05 email from Coulson telling Goodman he’s “way off the pace” | ||
Goodman says it was in the summer of 2005 that Coulson told him to “find a means to get into the young Royals”. | ||
Goodman explains young Royals were “coming into their own… nightclubs, girlfriends” around this time in 2005. | ||
Goodman explains that it was “tricky” getting into young Royals, because his face was well known “I’d be spotted by bodyguards in 30 secs” | ||
Goodman explains he would have looked out of place in the London nightclubs. | ||
Jury are taking back to Goodman’s email defending Mulcaire’s costs; Coulson replies “I’m sorry but it has to go”. | ||
Goodman reply to Coulson email says losing Mulcaire would be a “pretty devastating loss to my network” | ||
Spens says Alexander payments to Mulcaire amounted to £12,300 | ||
There are 15 payments of £500 from editorial management budget: 7 from NOTW news desk to Mulcaire on this schedule | ||
Spens cites a sample memo (of many) dated 10/01/06 to Kuttner: “attached credit made to source… whose identity is security protected” | ||
Same memo says details of source were known to the paper – in this case Mulcaire. | ||
This form of words came from Kuttner says Goodman: “this is what I was required to do to get cash contributor payments” | ||
Goodman confirms that Coulson arranged the payment to Mulcaire with Kuttner. | ||
Goodman says Kuttner told him that Coulson had spoken to him: took details of ‘Alexander’ and “it was a project lasting for two months” | ||
07/02/06 email from Goodman to Coulson about tenth anniversary of the death of Chris Blythe, their joint friend. | ||
Goodman writes to Coulson: “might we extend matey for one more week?” Goodman says “I think he agreed” | ||
“It made finding him and Kate a whole lot more probable” wrote Goodman to Coulson of hacking the phones of William’s aides | ||
Coulson replies “fine” to Goodman’s request to extend Mulcaire trial period. | ||
23/02/06 Goodman emails another NOTW journalist about William being out of Sandhurst “heading straight to see Kate” – parents near Reading. | ||
Goodman says he has no idea where Sandhurst: email talks about contacting picture desks to get a snap. | ||
Spens adduces transcript of a voicemail left on Kate Middleton‘s phone, recorded by Mulcaire, played to Goodman, with William’s movements | ||
Minutes later Goodman emails NOTW journalist with details of Wiliam’s movements and suggesting digging into Middleton’s family. | ||
Goodman is asked about another NOTW journalist who cannot be named for legal reasons. | ||
The Editor’s Conferences | ||
This NOTW journalist attended editor’s conferences with Coulson: phones “would often come up in discussion” | ||
This NOTW journalist would talk about “phone traffic… great emphasis placed on time, late at night, early in the morning, family & friends | ||
Goodman talks about “great scramble” to find Ioworth – a lotto winner – who was mentioned in editor’s conference. | ||
“Everyone was keen to find him…. triangulate him from mobile phone signal. It was obvious to me he was using mobile phone data” Goodman | ||
Goodman says Coulson said: “That’s enough of that, we don’t talk about this stuff in conference anymore” | ||
BREAKING: Goodman says that another NOTW journo would “clearly” talk about messages to do with phone hacking in editorial conferences | ||
Goodman says spoke to NOTW journo about hacking “he wouldn’t have tolerated sharing Glenn Mulcaire with me. Would have been World War 3” | ||
Goodman explains “dark arts… means that anything that isn’t straight forward reporting… inquiry agents etc.” | ||
11/03/06 Goodman writes about ‘neutral response’ to Kate Middleton liaison with Prince William from official sources. | ||
11/03/06 Goodman reprimanded for not going through supervisors in a NOTW email. “Do we have official confirmation for CD welsh” | ||
Goodman says story of Middleton has come direct from William. Senior NOTW journalist queries this. | ||
Goodman explains that story that “came from William himself” was a voicemail message left on Jamie Lowther Pinkerton’s phone. | ||
Prince Harry and Chelsy Davy Story | ||
Different sub-topic: Prince Harry and Chelsy Davy. 16/03/06 email to Goodman mentions this story and James Weatherup | ||
Goodman replies to queries about Chelsy: “she gets calls from him and he’s completely not in a good condition… piss ups” | ||
Goodman talks of a make or break holiday for Harry and Chelsy. | ||
A week later Goodman emails finance about £600 for Harry story: “My guy came up with make or break holiday and drunken phone calls” | ||
Email exchange between Goodman and another journo talks about Mulcaire’s “input” | ||
March 2006 and ‘Alexander’ aka Mulcaire is paid for 19/03/06 story for Chelsy and Harry story. “Clearly hacking, yes” says Goodman | ||
Goodman thinks the story of travel came from Asprey’s phone. The drunken phone calls came from a source in South Africa. | ||
Next sub-topic called ‘Ginger’ by Spens: refers to police transcript of voicemail message from William to Harry, pretending to be Chelsy | ||
This transcript came from microcassettes recovered from searches of Mulcaire. | ||
William puts on a female voice: “Hi it’s Chelsy here. You’re the best looking ginger I’ve ever seen…. You big hairy fat ginger” | ||
Spens adduces related NOTW story from 09/04/06, exclusive to Goodman and Thurlbeck, and an “ear bashing phone call” | ||
Payment for £700 to Mulcaire for the story: “Hacking, yes, of course” says Goodman. Some confusion because NOTW changed story a bit. | ||
NOTW claimed it was Chelsy and added words “I love you” | ||
12/04/06 email from Goodman about Mulcaire AKA Mr Alexander: “relying heavily on him to work same magic over passing out party” | ||
Jury shown transcript of voicemail recovered from Mulcaire’s home address left by Ritchie, Commander at Sandhurst; “Jamie…” | ||
The voicemail message from Commandant to Lowther Pinkerton talks about an “incident” on Harry’s Passing Out ceremony 12/04/06 | ||
Goodman emails other NOTW staff about Commandant complaining to Lowther Pinkerton about passing out “incident” | ||
Sorry it’s not Harry’s passing out Ceremony – it’s Williams. | ||
Senior NOTW journo “remind me how do we know it’s true?”. Goodman explains that William had left voice message on aide’s phone explaining | ||
15/04/06 Goodman is emailed about line in draft article which quote William saying he’s pissed: “massively dangerous to source” | ||
Goodman says he wasn’t exposing Mulcaire as a source in this exchange – but altered article to remove direct quotation. | ||
16/04/06 final NOTW article doesn’t quote William saying he was “pissed but not that pissed” – a ‘family friend says’ replaces it. | ||
16/04/06 publication of this story triggers a payment of £3000 to Mulcaire. | ||
Other NOTW senior journalist was shown “transcript of original message… an an adjutant… William’s message” says Goodman | ||
Goodman says he made these transcripts in the office, but didn’t manage to download from email account in 2006. | ||
“My office computer was never siezed by police in 2006, because NI argued that it had lots of legitimate material,’ says Goodman. | ||
BREAKING: Goodman says the only records of his emails are the ones he downloaded in 2006, and from an internal NI process the following year | ||
28/04/06 Coulson emails Goodman “how do we know Harry true?” Goodman replies “it’s from the same source we had on a retainer” | ||
“We absolutely know it to be true, but we’ll have to blag a confession from Paddy tomorrow” says Goodman in response to Coulson | ||
Goodman explains this was about a girl who had encounter with Harry, and message left on Paddy Harverson‘s phone. Goodman: “Hacking, yes” | ||
Goodman explains that the source on retainer was Mulcaire and “absolutely know to be true” is because voicemail was source. | ||
27/06/06 Goodman emails about “credits” for previous edition of NOTW. £750 pre publication agreement for Mr Alexander. | ||
Goodman debates with another senior NOTW journalist about the level of payment to ‘Alexander’ | ||
The final payment for Prince William‘s birthday present reduced down to £200 – a result from hacking Helen Asprey’s phone says Goodman | ||
28/06/06 Goodman emails Coulson “Harry story could be huge this week… got a direct way into this… and girl who tried to snog him” | ||
Goodman wrote a “100 percent reliable source” – he says now “I believe this was Chelsy Davy friend down in Cape Town”: no payment | ||
Spens explains how this was another email forwarded by Goodman to himself when released from custody in 2006 | ||
“I was in a hurry, trying to get as many emails as possible” says Goodman of downloading correspondence with Coulson after arrest in 2006 | ||
Prince William Training Exercise Story | ||
26/07/06 Goodman emails Coulson on “Kate Copy… sourcing. That fellah who used to be on the monthly retainer for us” – Glenn Mulcaire | ||
Goodman says the “rock solid” refers to voicemail interception in email to Coulson. | ||
Goodman is working on a “William dead” story in July 06 quoting “Same source…. W’s exact words” | ||
Story refers to two cadets who nearly died during a training exercises: “these two guys just died in front of us and had to be resuscitated” | ||
Goodman agrees that the reference to William’s “exact words” was in that para. | ||
Goodman says the near death story during training was a voice mail message hacked by Mulcaire from Jamie Lowther Pinkerton. | ||
Spens explains the next topic is relatively short: about Royal Green Books. Then a longer topic about what happened to Goodman post arrest | ||
Spens says the brief subject now “is whether these Royal Directories have anything to do with hacking or blagging” | ||
24/01/03 Goodman email to Coulson about Sir Michael Peat and “turning his mobile…. he’s a pain too” | ||
Goodman says the source of this alleged Peat affair was Mark Bolland , Sir Michael Peat‘s deputy. | ||
Goodman says he already had a mobile number from Sir Michael Peat after meeting him with Rebekah Brooks, soon after appointment in 2002 | ||
“There had been strained relations with the media up until” says Goodman of meeting Peat, private secretary to Prince of Wales. | ||
Goodman explains the cut off message should continue “he’s a pain to follow” – chauffeured around in different cars. | ||
Six hours later Goodman emails Coulson: “should have Peats reg… Greg’s people turning Peat’s mobile” Goodman reiterates getting address | ||
Goodman says he thinks he gave Greg Miskiw Sir Michael Peat‘s number. Mulcaire 24/01/03 notes show a ‘Greg’ tasking | ||
Looking at Mulcaire’s notes for Sir Michael Peat, there is no entry for a mobile number. | ||
“Who would have tasked Mr Miskiw to task Mulcaire?” asks Spens. “Someone senior to him…” says Goodman. | ||
“The chain of information seems to be Andy Coulson to me, and then Greg.” says Goodman of Mulcaire tasking. | ||
Email seen before to Kuttner about “deliberately cryptic payment” 23/01/03 not authorised until 28/01/03 | ||
Goodman says he only got Green Book when he paid ‘Mr Farish”: “you’d never get anything on trust” | ||
Spens says that Mulcaire was given the information about Peat from Green Book: Goodman denies he ever passed it on to Miskiw. | ||
02/04/03 email from Goodman talks about Sir Michael Peat and turning on mobile: Goodman says it was his own mobile he referred to. | ||
Goodman says he “never” used the Royal Green Book or ITD for phone hacking, and “never” revealed info in them to anyone else at NOTW. | ||
Back again at 10 am tomorrow. |
Note: All the defendants deny all the charges. The trial continues.
Related Articles
Texts to Rebekah Brooks from Tony Blair on the Eve of her Arrest
Brooks – Coulson email exchange on Goodman Mulcaire guilty pleas: It is all going so well
Peter Jukes on ABC Radio
Rebekah Brooks Takes The Stand At Phone Hacking Trial – The Daily Beast
The Brooks Plan B and Blair Unofficial Advisor emails
Previous Posts
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 12 Mar
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 13 Mar
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 17 Mar
Links: The Trial So Far | Full Trial Summary | Indexed Evidence | Breaking News
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 19 Mar | Live Tweeting the hacking trial
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 20 Mar | Live Tweeting the hacking trial
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 25 Mar | Live Tweeting the hacking trial