Wednesday 8 January 2014
Summary | ||
Prosecution Case continues with Evidence on Cheryl Carter | ||
Giving Evidence – Operation Sasha Detective DS John Massey | ||
Witness – Susan Panuccio (former Chief Financial Officer of News Group Ltd) | ||
Prosecution Present Evidence about Payments | ||
Prosecution Counsel questions Susan Panuccio | ||
Counsel for Rebekah Brooks cross examines Susan Panuccio | ||
Counsel for Stuart Kuttner cross examines Susan Panuccio | ||
Further Prosecution questions to Susan Panuccio | ||
Jury questions to Susan Panuccio | ||
Witness – Gary Keegan (Husband of Deborah Keegan – PA to Rebekah Brooks) | ||
Prosecution Counsel questions Gary Keegan | ||
Counsel for Cheryl Carter cross examines Gary Keegan | ||
Witness – Deborah Keegan (PA to Rebekah Brooks) | ||
Prosecution Counsel questions Deborah Keegan | ||
Counsel for Cheryl Carter cross examines Deborah Keegan |
Prosecution Case continues with Evidence on Cheryl Carter | ||
Giving Evidence – Operation Sasha Detective DS John Massey | ||
The jury is back in for the #hackingtrial – continuing with the evidence of DS John Massey, interviewing Cheryl Carter, Brooks’ PA | ||
Back at Carter’s third police interview tape. DS Massey has a serious of questions and wants to “cut to the chase” | ||
Massey says Gary Keegan – Brooks’ driver – was in London collecting her. “I’m sure she was off,” says Carter of Brooks | ||
Carter says she trusts Gary Keegan, and says he would not provide an untrue account: “I’m sure she was off that week,’ says Carter | ||
“I never have stored things under my name – maybe he would have allowed me or maybe he wouldn’t,” says Carter | ||
“You described it as “shit'”, DS Massey says to Carter of her archived material. “But these notebooks and everything don’t seem like ‘shit'” | ||
Continued police interview with Carter: “When we moved I would have just picked up a bundle of everthing…. just getting it out the way” | ||
Carter explains to police they were only given a couple of days notice when Brooks was elevated to CEO of News International | ||
DS Massey asks Carter why archivist Nick Mays would have “singled her out”. It didn’t seem unusual or odd, said Carter | ||
Carter explains that as a beauty editor she used to get a lot of material at the main gate, which her son Nick would pick up | ||
Nick Carter was an editorial assistant in advertising: Carter would ask him to do favours “because he was my son” | ||
“Nick doesn’t ask questions, he’s not that kind of person. It was my business,” says Carter of the seven boxes she took from archives | ||
DS Massey asks what Nick is going to do in Australia: Carter: “He won’t work for the paper (Perth Sunday Times)… he will travel around” | ||
BREAKING: Carter says Brooks organised job as a secretary on Perth Sunday Times: “She spoke to John Hart… I’m going to be on £30k a year” | ||
“Did it cross your mind when you saw the boxes that this might be… interpreted as suspicious or illegal?” “No,” says Carter | ||
“100 percent, no. On my children’s life…” Carter denies police suggestion that Perth job organised by Brooks was a “payment in kind” | ||
Witness – Susan Panuccio (former Chief Financial Officer of News Group Ltd) | ||
Prosecution Present Evidence about Payments | ||
Anthony Edis QC, lead prosecution counsel, reads a statement to the jury about payments from News International. | ||
Mr Michael Gill, a previous witness, group financial controller for NI explains “to be deleted” tag on Stuart Kuttner | ||
The “to be deleted” tag is not sinister, but part of the accounting tags for staff who have left NI | ||
Prosecution Counsel questions Susan Panuccio | ||
Edis for the prosecution calls Susan Panuccio at #hackingtrial | ||
Edis is not going to ask Panuccio much about her statement and her admissions: “real purpose so other counsel can explore matters” | ||
In 2008 Panuccio became CFO of News Group Ltd – she remained in post till Sept 2012 and is now CFO with News Corp Australia | ||
Panuccio started working for NI newspapers in 2004, but she’s only been quizzed about time post 2008 when promoted to CFO | ||
Panuccio never worked on the editorial floor, but would work with managing editors – she dealt with Mr Kuttner before retirement in 09 | ||
Panuccio explains the admin, HR and external events organised by the managing editor at a NI title | ||
Panuccio says is the responsibility to make sure payments aren’t made for illegal actions belongs to journalists and editors | ||
Edis asks about how a contract like Mulcaire’s £105k annual contract should have been dealt with, though paid weekly | ||
Panuccio says would query why a contract was being dealt with that way. Contracts over £50k would have been dealt with at editorial level | ||
Laidlaw for Brooks cross examines Panuccio over the financial requests made to her by the police | ||
Panuccio agrees with Laidlaw that the police quizzed her over her role as CFO and historical payments | ||
Panuccio explains James Murdoch replaced Les Hinton in late 2007, and James brought Panuccio in as CFO in 2008 | ||
Panuccio agrees James Murdoch saw that “improvements could be made” in News International | ||
James Murdoch remained CEO of News International until September 09, when he is replaced by Rebekah Brooks. He became chair of NI | ||
Panuccio agrees she inherited a “financial governance system that had been in place for some time” and planned to “refresh” it | ||
Panuccio agrees James M and Brooks planned to “tighten up the governance” of NI. The executive team was extended. | ||
Mr Cheeseborough Chief Information officer was added. Will Lewis and Simon Greenberg added by Brooks to executive team | ||
Counsel for Rebekah Brooks cross examines Susan Panuccio | ||
Laidlaw for Brooks asks former CFO Panuccio about “challenges… Mrs Brooks faced… First chief executive job…. no previous experience” | ||
Laidlaw explains the revenue of News International was “£1 billion plus at this time”: Panuccio says “she was on a steep learning curve” | ||
Panuccio reported to Brooks. Brooks to James Murdoch. James to his father Rupert (or perhaps Chase) in New York | ||
Panuccio agrees that Will Lewis was hired to deal with the developing phone hacking problem, which would become a crisis | ||
Panuccio agrees that the years Brooks was CEO were successful: “Yes, we hit our financial targets.” | ||
Laidlaw asks about Kuttner: Panuccio agrees he was deeply experienced and good at his job. | ||
Laidlaw asks about NOTW in 2000-03. Panuccio had never heard of Mulcaire and his companies until his arrest in 2006 | ||
Panuccio is quizzed about payments to third parties on the ECS system at News International by Laidlaw, counsel for Brooks. | ||
Panuccio says she does not know at what level editors would have been involved in contributor payments – each arrangement different | ||
“The profitability was lower so there was more analysis of the numbers,” says former NI CFO Susan Panuccio of the year 2008-9: worst results | ||
The £50k editorial approval threshold did not change in 2008, says Panuccio, just the person NI editors had to report to: it became her | ||
Even as far as September 2011, cash payments were permissible by NI papers | ||
Laidlaw puts Brooks’ recollection on Thomas Cooke payments while she was a the Sun circa 2006 to Susan Panuccio | ||
Laidlaw for Brooks says she remembers Thomas Cooke payments being treated differently from cash: Panuccio can’t confirm | ||
Panuccio can’t comment if the forms for Thomas Cooke payments were different, or had different accountancy codes | ||
Laidlaw says Brooks recalls that Thomas Cooke payments weren’t anonymous: Panuccio says she can’t comment on that | ||
Laidlaw for Brooks goes on to cross examine Panuccio, former CFO, on the issue of contracts. | ||
Panuccio implemented a new contracts policy in 2008, but this did not affect editorial – so she can’t comment on managing editors etc. | ||
Panuccio says there’s no automatic system picking up broken up payments accumulating in excess of £50k: would have to be referred | ||
“It should have gone up the MGN director,” Panuccio says of Mulcaire contract. | ||
Laidlaw asks Panuccio about the ’email deletion’ email from Brooks: “she had 10k emails in her in-box” says former CFO | ||
Apologies for temporary suspension of #hackingtrial service. Stomach pains and nausea but rescued by @GaetanPortal and @jamesdoleman | ||
Counsel for Stuart Kuttner cross examines Susan Panuccio | ||
Caplan for Kuttner cross examines Panuccio on Kuttner’s qualities: A man of integrity? “As far as I could see,” says former NI CFO | ||
Caplan for Kuttner refers to NOTW budget cuts for Nine Consultancy (Mulcaire) and exchange with Steve Mears of Finance. | ||
Further Prosecution questions to Susan Panuccio | ||
Edis has further questions for Panuccio: “how much do you know about NOTW in 2000-03?” Panuccio shrugs: “Nothing” | ||
Edis asks Panuccio if she conducted some kind of inquiry into Mulcaire payments: “Yes, I have.” | ||
As for the NOTW budget 2005-6 about Nine Consultancy from 24/02/05 Panuccio can’t confirm whether Mulcaire’s payments were reduced | ||
As for the NOTW budget June 2006-07 about Nine Consultancy in Feb 06 Panuccio can’t confirm whether Mulcaire’s payments were reduced | ||
Edis goes to Panuccio’s statement about her financial oversight: they wouldn’t go through things “line by line” – i.e. by transaction | ||
“How does that expression ‘line by line’ fit with a system where payments have to be authorised?” asks Edis of Panuccio, former NI CEO | ||
Panuccio is asked how long it would take her, as an accountant, to run her eye over hundreds of payments: “If I understood, pretty quickly” | ||
Panuccio says she has no knowledge of budgetary pressure on NOTW 00-03. 04-06 some knowledge of fall of circulation from high of 3.8million | ||
Justice Saunders gets Panuccio to clarify that the Mulcaire contract may have been discussed with Steve Mears at corporate level | ||
Panuccio confirms that any payments over £50k should have gone to managing director of NGN before she took over as CFO | ||
Panuccio says that she remembers Brooks having a blackberry, and iPhone and an iPad | ||
Jury questions to Susan Panuccio | ||
Jury asks about audits of payments – usually 10-15 across the company says Panuccio, though not all editorial | ||
Jury asks through Saunders, whether any audit picked up the Mulcaire payment: “A risk was flagged,” says Panuccio: “I can’t recollect” | ||
Break to 1.10 pm. I’ll look for a Boots, dioralyte solution and ginger beer! | ||
Witness – Gary Keegan (Husband of Deborah Keegan – PA to Rebekah Brooks) | ||
Prosecution Counsel questions Gary Keegan | ||
Bryant Heron for the crown calls Gary Keegan as a witness: he was Brooks’ occasional driver and helped move 7 archive boxes on 08/07/11 | ||
Keegan explains his wife Deborah was a PA to Brooks in 2011. He helped out occasionally as a driver | ||
Keegan cannot remember exactly what time of day he asked to help out, but he was already at Thomas More Square | ||
Keegan was “just there in case (Brooks) needed a drive home.” His wife Deborah called to ask if he could help with some boxes. | ||
Keegan said he received a call from his wife “from Cheryl Carter”. In his statement he remembers going to executive 10th Floor Office at TMS | ||
At the moment he can’t remember if he went up there. But he met up with Cheryl and her son Nick and went to TMS 5 to help remove some books | ||
Keegan can’t remember how many boxes “but they were very heavy and we had to commandeer a trolley” | ||
They took the trolley by lift to loading bay in the basement. Keegan waited by the boxes while Nick Carter got his mini, and the loaded up | ||
Nick Carter then drove off with the boxes. | ||
Counsel for Cheryl Carter cross examines Gary Keegan | ||
Burke, counsel for Cheryl Carter, cross examines Gary Keegan. He doesn’t think he bought Brooks to work, but merely to give life back | ||
Keegan says he doesn’t think she needed a lift back that day. By this time he’d been a relief driver for a couple of years | ||
Burke for Carter establishes that his wife Deborah, PA for Brooks, would use her to run errands: “Anything heavy,” says Keegan | ||
“Always it would be Deborah who called me,” says Keegan. Burke asserts it was immediately: “Completely out to the blue,” says Keegan | ||
“It could be,” says Keegan about the timing of 4pm. He says he was “good friends” with Cheryl and Nick Carter | ||
Keegan is shown the NI archive boxes and confirms they were the ones he picked up in 2011. He can’t remember returning the trolley | ||
Of Keegan’s failure to return the trolley to archives, Justice Saunders jokes “We’ll need a special verdict on that.” | ||
In his statement, Keegan says Nick Carter told him they were full of his mother’s stuff. Now he can’t remember he says, relies on statement | ||
Witness – Deborah Keegan (PA to Rebekah Brooks) | ||
Prosecution Counsel questions Deborah Keegan | ||
Edis for the prosecution calls Deborah Keegan, Brooks’ second PA along with Cheryl Carter | ||
Deborah Keegan has made two written statements but – as per normal – must ask permission to refer to them in court | ||
Edis asks about the removal of the 7 boxes on 8th July, and asks D Keegan about first mention of the boxes: that afternoons she says | ||
Edis asks D Keegan about a witness statement made in early Jan 2012: “what was it Nick Mayes asked you to retrieve at archive?” | ||
“Who decided what went in the boxes?” asks Edis. “Not so much a choice but a matter of space… didn’t feel right to bin it.” | ||
“If I filled the from in I don’t recall,” says D Keegan of archiving material | ||
On the 8th July 2011 when she called her husband “I assumed the job was done,” says D Keegan of the 7 boxes | ||
Edis shows D Keegan a document from “Cheryl Carter defence file” | ||
Keegan is shown the Brooks 7 boxes archiving form from September 09 and recognises it as a newer form. | ||
“You would write anything on it,” says Keegan of archive form: “I don’t want to sound flippant but you just wanted to get the job done.” | ||
Counsel for Cheryl Carter cross examines Deborah Keegan | ||
Burke for Carter establishes that Carter and Keegan were “very old friends” but she notified NI lawyers about subsequent meetings | ||
In all meetings between Keegan and Carter there was always a third party present | ||
Keegan is shown floor plan with Brooks’ private office “more like a cloakroom” says former PA. CC and DK – initials of PAs – shared office | ||
The filing space for the PAs, says Burke for Carter, “extremely limited” | ||
23/05/11 a temp Teresa Zanuski emails Cheryl and Deborah a filing list itemising where items were filed | ||
The list is “fairly particular” over the filing cabinets – nominating drawers with share certificates, marriage certificate, gun licence | ||
Zanussi particularised Brooks’ property in JULY list of 131 pages | ||
Page 130 of July 2011 list details Rebekah Brooks notebooks. Keegan remembers a safe that didn’t work, but never had leave to go to it | ||
Keegan describes “thick carpet land” of executive floor for James and Rupert Murdoch, who did not like clutter (unlike the Sun offices) | ||
Late summer of 2009 Brooks moves to RKM’s office divided in two: half to Brooks, and the other half to James | ||
Keegan confirms she did not get to know Carter until Brooks moved in as editor | ||
Keegan confirms that Carter wrote a weekly Sun beauty column for 7 years: and had many magazines for inspiration, and samples send | ||
Keegan confirms Carter pasted all her cuttings in her notebooks. | ||
Keegan says Carter was unhappy leaving the Sun, had to write articles at home: weeks off work due to illness, very unhappy in corp land | ||
Brooks “probably took her notebooks to corporateland” says D Keegan: she never kept an kind of inventory | ||
“Legally we had to keep stuff for seven year, but we had stuff ten years old” says Keegan of clearing Brooks’ office | ||
Burke asks about the “nee Wade” filing of 7 archive boxes: “we wouldn’t hark back,” says Brooks former PA Deborah Keegan | ||
Burke then focuses on the twelve years of desk diaries in Brooks’ office written in by both PAs and Brooks herself | ||
Carter had to travel from Essex. They would open the post, flagging up letters for Rebekah. They’d bring her breakfast | ||
There were events in the evening as well. This was a ‘pretty average day” says Deborah Keegan. Brooks would close the doors for meetings | ||
“You effectively run her life,” Keegan agreed of her time with Brooks: deal with finance, mother, mortgages “Anything,” says Keegan | ||
Keegan says she would email Brooks and Carter even though the latter was sat next to her. Burke for Carter cites a message about RJM calling | ||
“Chery silly question – have you a receipt for Charlies’ hotel in Doncaster” Burke cites another of Keegan’s work emails | ||
Other emails about Rebekah leaving her keys in the flat etc. shown to Jury by counsel for Carter, Trevor Burke, to explain nature of work | ||
Other emails to the PAs talk of setting up dinner with KRM, getting shopping from M&S: both PAs always shared emails | ||
Brooks had two personal trainer: Zac at the local London gym: Calum who ran ‘boot camps’ in Oxford | ||
Keegan can’t remember archivist Nick Mays emailing her about Brooks’ memorabilia: “I didn’t pay much attention” says Keegan in May 2011 | ||
Keegan laughs at Carter’s memory of saying: “Where the fuck do we put this stuff?” | ||
Brooks PA Keegan cannot remember conversation with fellow PA Carter about storing the 7 archive boxes in her office | ||
Keegan can only “very vaguely” checking Brooks’ bank records to get her location when the Milly Dowler story broke in July 2011 | ||
Keegan says that she, Brooks and Carter were “very upset” when the Milly Dowler story brokes. “Rebekah would not do that,” says Keegan | ||
Keegan laughs at the suggestion she would have every thought her boss, Mrs Brooks, “would be of interest to police” | ||
Brooks resigned while Keegan was on holiday in Italy: “I expected to come back and find things the same,” she tells Trevor Burke, QC | ||
Keegan says “there was a lot of toing and fro’ing out of Brooks’ office: though never gave advance notice of NOTW closure – only rumours | ||
Hong Kong and Shanghai bank called back re Brooks’ banking statement, and movements around the time of Milly Dowler hacking | ||
Another call from Brooks’ mother ‘Betty’ concerned for her daughter: PAs reassure her that Brooks is OK | ||
One email talks about Brooks’ to all staff talks of “a town hall meeting” with NOTW staff | ||
The email identifies a town hall NOTW meeting led by Brooks at 4pm – round the same time Carter removed 7 boxes from archive | ||
Keegan says she doesn’t believe Brooks was involved in storage or retrieval of boxes. | ||
Brooks’ bootcamp was, according to emails to Calum shown to the jury, rescheduled from Milly Dowler scandal week to end of July. | ||
Burke has two more ‘discrete’ topics he wants to explore with Brooks’ second PA. | ||
Keegan remembers Cheryl Carter started their own make up brand and got the product into Superdrug in 2011 | ||
Keegan agrees there was a falling out over Carter’s company – lawyers were involved, it was very unpleasant | ||
Carter “only shared her ambitions to go to Australia until after she took redundancy,” agrees Keegan. “And the window was getting smaller” | ||
Keegan remembers a man called Evan Hammer coming to London to interview Carter for new Australian | ||
By Jan 2012 Keegan knew all about Carter’s plans to emigrate | ||
“It was a tough atmosphere to work in because Rebekah was very demanding… but we could say what we thought,” says Keegan former PA | ||
Keegan agrees that Cheryl would be a ‘intermediary’ sometimes: but she was an upright person. | ||
Laidlaw wants to cross examine D Keegan, but this will continue 10 am tomorrow | ||
Coming up: some of the tweets from Edis’ questioning of Brooks’ PA Deborah Keegan, that got locked out of twitter | ||
Phone-hacking trial: Brooks was very upset at Dowler allegations says her PA http://po.st/XwqkvF via @thedrum | ||
Please RT to get Twitter @support to change my settings so that my #hackingtrial tweets aren’t blocked as spam, and I get locked out |
Note: All the defendants deny all the charges. The trial continues.
Related Articles
Survey Results and my use of ‘BREAKING’ on tweets
Media and Law Review of the Year 2013: Part 2 Phone Hacking Blagging Bribing and the Trial
Has the phone hacking trial created a new form of journalism?
Goodman/Coulson Emails over the Hacked Royal Voicemails
Transcript of Voicemail Message left on Prince Harry’s Phone
Previous Posts
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 19 Dec
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 6 Jan
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 7 Jan
Links: The Trial So Far | Full Trial Summary | Indexed Evidence | Breaking News
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 8 Jan | Live Tweeting the hacking trial
Pingback: The Trial Ahead: plus Industrial Espionage and Personal Violation | Live Tweeting the hacking trial
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 13 Jan | Live Tweeting the hacking trial
Pingback: HACKING TRIAL LIVE TWEETS – 14 JAN | Live Tweeting the hacking trial