Monday 9 December 2013
Summary | ||
The Prosecution Case Continues | ||
Back at the Hacking Trial | ||
Counsel for Rebekah Brooks on Bribing Charges | ||
Witness – Brigadier John Donnelly (Director of Army Personnel Services) | ||
Prosecution Counsel Rebecca Chalkley QC questions Brigadier John Donnelly | ||
Counsel for Rebekah Brooks cross examines Brigadier Donnelly | ||
Further Prosecution questions to Brigadier Donnelly | ||
Witness – Operation Elveden Detective DC Briddon | ||
Prosecution Counsel questions DC Briddon | ||
Counsel for Rebekah Brooks cross examines DC Briddon |
The Prosecution Case Continues | ||
Back at the Hacking Trial | ||
Back at the #hackingtrial for what looks like a full uninterrupted week | ||
Chalkley for the crown recalls DC Tilbury who has done some checking for Brooks’ counsel, Mr Laidlaw over a spreadsheet of payments | ||
Counsel for Rebekah Brooks on Bribing Charges | ||
Laidlaw is going over the charges against Brooks alleging she bribed public officials. | ||
Laidlaw, counsel for Brooks, looks at a cash payment to the wife of a public official on the 27th June 2006. | ||
“No need to take that attitude with me,” says Laidlaw to DC Tilbury who answers quickly about cash payments: “just wait…” | ||
Counsel for Brooks hones on the precise dates of payment, clearance, and arrival of funds from News International to wife of public official | ||
DC Tilbury evidence is on payment for alleged Will in Bikini photos to wife of Sandhurst official, prior to publication, collected in cash | ||
Witness – Brigadier John Donnelly (Director of Army Personnel Services) | ||
Prosecution Counsel Rebecca Chalkley QC questions Brigadier John Donnelly | ||
Chalkley for prosecution calls Brigadier John Donnelly; director of personnel services, responsible for discipline and policy etc | ||
Between 2006-9 one of Donnellys employees was Bettina Jordan-Barber, alleged to have received £40k in payments from the Sun | ||
Donnelly cannot talk about matters which might prejudice an ongoing investigation and court martial | ||
The amount of comment over a court martial is very tightly controlled to prevent prejudice of the ongoing investigation, says Brigadier | ||
Internally within the secretariat, only the rank and offence of those investigated in a court martial are revealed | ||
Donnelly explains that after a court martial, the name of accused and nature of offence, would be released to the public. | ||
Brigadier Donnelly has been asked to comment on two specific Sun stories: the first about the death of a decorated soldier from early 2007 | ||
Donnelly says the article was published before the authorities had a chance to conclude investigation and inform family of dead corporal | ||
Donnelly explains the army prefer to “brief the family sensitively” and so family have some control over what is released into public domain | ||
Chalkley for the crown now turns to second Sun story about the death of Prince Willam’s platoon commander, Major Roberts | ||
Donnelly explains Sun 07 article was published before “we fully briefed the family… we were not allowed to completely our… duty of care.” | ||
Donnelly duty to care to soldiers ‘they have to trust us to handle their information securely and discreetly.” Early release “undermines trust” | ||
Counsel for Rebekah Brooks cross examines Brigadier Donnelly | ||
Laidlaw for Brooks cross examines Brigadier Donnelly on these two Sun stories. | ||
Brigadier Donnelly is explains more about Sun story of Major Roberts death: he was killed on 04/10/07. Sun frontpage 06/10/07 | ||
Brigadier Donnelly had said the Sun “went too early”: Laidlaw shows Donnelly the MOD press release published once next of kin informed and ready | ||
Laidlaw points out that the date on the press release was the 5th October 2007, day after Major Alexis Roberts killed by an IED. | ||
The press release gives photo, military background, time with Gurkha rifles, time at Sandhurst, with heartfelt tributes for other officers | ||
Brigadier Donnelly confirms that Major Roberts was a deeply respected and admired figure. | ||
The Brigadier confirms that by 5th of October all the essential preparation seems to have been done before Sun publication | ||
Laidlaw: “I don’t want to take advantage you… but if the police had shown you this before, would you not have made statement on oath” | ||
Brigadier Donnelly: “I made the claim on basis of what I was shown,” in response his statement the Sun went too early with Major Roberts death | ||
Laidlaw shows how other papers pickup and follow the Major Roberts death story on 6th October: telegraph online, CNN, BBC online | ||
Brigadier is shown a ‘restricted management’ pack over MOD media briefing over the repatriation of Major Roberts’ body. | ||
Laidlaw produces another internal MOD document about coverage of inquest over Major Roberts’ death in July 2008 | ||
Laidlaw for Brooks shows the jury the press’s coverage of Major Robert’s funeral | ||
Laidlaw for Brooks takes Brigadier Donnelly to the second Sun story about the death of a member of the parachute regiment. | ||
Laidlaw tries to summarise Donnelly’s concern “there had been publicity before investigation completed… and could inform widow” | ||
“I understand the difference between the public interest and the interest to the public,” says Connelly. Saunders replies… 1/2 | ||
Saunders to Brigadier Donnelly: “I wish you would explain it to me sometime.” Laughter from court | ||
Laidlaw goes through timeline for para corporal: he died 20/08/06 in Sangin during a firefight with Taliban, three others injured | ||
Laidlaw shows another MOD press release with biography of killed soldier, photo etc. He says the Guardian was the first to report his death | ||
Sun’s coverage printed starts on 22nd August 06 and an article about Corporal Budd’s death. | ||
Laidlaw moves forward to October 2006 and Sun article on circumstances of the parachute corporal’s death | ||
The Sun article is about the “extraordinary actions” of “soldier hero” who saved 7 others, and suggestion of a posthumous Victoria Cross | ||
Donnelly remembers the Sun story Laidlaw has just read out. Agrees it is “very positive” coverage. | ||
Brigadier Donnelly says MOD has “a very tried and tested procedure for medals… not dependent on media coverage.” | ||
By the December of 06 Corporal Budd had been awarded the Victoria Cross. Then Feb 07 Laidlaw there was “surprising turn of events.” | ||
A forensic examination of Corporal Budd’s body found fragments of NATO stock bullets. Military definition of friendly fire is fratricide | ||
Brigadier Donnelly explains this is not abnormal: the risk comes from close quarter combat covering fire. | ||
Donnelly contends MOD need to investigate such incidents without major publicity: at least for the sake of other soldiers concerned | ||
Laidlaw shows the jury the first page of MOD briefing which is marked “not for release”: RMC special investigations branch to contact widow | ||
Laidlaw now goes to ‘if pressed… lines to take’ from MOD release into friendly fire investigation & ‘dynamics of close quarter battle” | ||
Donnelly confirms friendly fire doesn’t effect Victoria Cross: “The bravery of the man is the same whoever fired the shot,” adds Saunders | ||
The friendly fire investigation had been reported on the 16th by other papers: on the 17th Sun quote widow and relatives. | ||
In late November 2007 Oxfordshire coroner finds one of the shots that contributed to 3 Para Corporal’s death was of Nato stock. | ||
Laidlaw asks Donnelly if there “has been some debate” about court martials. The Brigadier says they are compliant with human rights act | ||
Donelly doesn’t agreed with Laidlaw’s suggestion debate has changed the nature of court martials. “Not during my time,” says the Brigadier | ||
Laidlaw goes to Guardian article 05/09/11, “MOD agrees to more openness on courts martial.” | ||
The Guardian article is about an incident in Basra, and how the MOD has agreed to become more transparent about courts martial | ||
Donnelly says he cannot answer Laidlaw because he was posted away, and he can’t answer on behalf of the prosecuting authorities | ||
Donnelly says public and press aren’t excluded for courts martial, but there may be an accessibility issue because they’re based in barracks | ||
Laidlaw asks Donnelly if practice had changed: Donnelly “just as civilian justice system evolves, so does the military system.” | ||
Further Prosecution questions to Brigadier Donnelly | ||
Chalkley for prosecution re-examines the Brigadier about investigation into death of Corporal Budd. | ||
Donnelly said the investigation had not concluded by the time of publication of Sun report. | ||
Normally, information would be released after a ‘service inquiry’. | ||
Chalkley goes back to the fatality notice for Major Alexis Roberts shown Donnelly earlier: once on MOD website safe for newspapers to report | ||
Chalkley goes to the two editions of the Sun story: the first story has “the officer who cannot be named” with an exclusive tag | ||
The third edition of Sun article which names Major Roberts. | ||
Donnelly said the Corporal Budd information was not ‘complete’ so they were not ready to release the details. | ||
Families are given ‘a few hours of grace’ before information about fatalities | ||
10 minute break | ||
Witness – Operation Elveden Detective DC Briddon | ||
Prosecution Counsel questions DC Briddon | ||
Prosecution recall DC Briddon and asks the jury to turn to a news stories related to corruption: in this case the William in a Bikini story | ||
Now an exclusive from October 06 comparing it with internal MOD news briefs. “It is known that the Sun newspaper has acquired this story” | ||
Another Sun story about a female soldier dying in Iraq has no MOD internal newsbrief attached | ||
Another Sun exclusive 06 about accident at an army training camp has internal MOD newsbrief: Yorkshire Post, Mirror, NOTW, followed up | ||
Prosecution compare another Aug Sun army training camp exclusive about an engagement with internal memo: in Mail, Mirror etc after | ||
The Jury are shown the Sun frontpage about death of Major Roberts. Newsbrief on repatriation dated 08/10 but the story on the 06/10 in Sun | ||
Another story about Prince William‘s attendance at funeral is also reported in other papers | ||
A draft MOD newsbrief from 14/11/07 and then a Sun exclusive three days later. | ||
An MOD newsbrief for a sex swinger major, another Sun exclusive, was drafted the day after it was published. | ||
Back to April 08 military story: the source of the internal MOD newbrief is marked ‘Betsy Jordan-Barber’ | ||
Another Sun article and matching MOD internal news brief sourced to Betsy Jordan-Barber | ||
All these stories, now being connected to MOD internal news briefs, were covered last week in relation to Sun payments to Jordan-Barber | ||
Sun story of drugs on ship, covered. So too an allegation of sexual misconduct. First covered elsewhere: second only in Sun | ||
Many of these MOD ‘newsbriefs’ are ‘defensive’ because of a story appearing in the Sun, and followed up by other newspapers | ||
Another MOD defensive newsbrief suspects Mail on Sunday has got hold of military story – but it is only published in Sun, says DC Briddon | ||
The Sun’s spring 09 exclusives on fake medals is covered on same day by Times and police confirm source was Bettina Jordan-Barber | ||
Jury shown again Sun headlines about illegal immigrant using military transport and army appearances in June 09 | ||
Jury shown a Sun exclusive from Aug 09 about swine flu in barracks, which is followed up by a dozen other papers | ||
Email between Brooks and Sun employee shown to jury 01/07/05 | ||
Email 05/07 from one Sun journo to another about ‘ace military contact’ “don’t want to put name in email for security reasons”. | ||
“The source is really good but has to be so careful,” Sun journalist explains to another in email cash payments to ‘ace military source’ | ||
29/03/06 Brendan Malinsky emails to Brooks about a “prison source story” 11/04 John Coles to Brooks on ‘cash payments” | ||
BREAKING: Sun journalist to Brooks email on cash payments: “I’d like to keep this secret as the source is a serving police officer” | ||
Email April 06 asking for cash payment from Brooks: “guy who got us picture works at Sandhurst…. doesn’t want it traced back to him” | ||
06/01/09 From Sun Journalist to Brooks, cc Mohan and Kavanagh: “Man at five…. spooks are keeping an open mind.” | ||
Back after lunchbreak at the #hackingtrial with Chalkley for the crown going over Sun stories with an ‘ace military source’ | ||
Jury shown Sun website asking Sandhurst officer or cadets to make contact | ||
Email to Brooks on ‘Harry’: “from my guys serving along side, he’s been moved up…. as a forward air controller. Dodging the bullets” | ||
10/01/08 Sun article about blood transfusion contamination of soldiers: BBC cover it that afternoon | ||
January 2008 another son article, followed by other coverage. Chalkley shows Bettina Jordan-Barber collecting payment for £5k for story | ||
The end of the section shows selection of emails from Brooks thanking the Sun journalist for his work for the newspaper | ||
Chalkley for the crown now takes the jury “Brooks – Jordan-Barber” timeline. | ||
Timeline has Brooks as a pink line with events (e.g. a payment authorisation), Sun stories and Jordan-Barber’s leave, posting etc, | ||
A parallel document in the Brooks/Jordan-Barber timeline connects payments to her, Sun journalist, collection, story etc. | ||
Counsel for Rebekah Brooks cross examines DC Briddon | ||
Laidlaw, counsel for Brooks, has some questions for DC Briddon case officer for count 5 – asks him how long he’s held that role (March 12) | ||
Briddon corrects himself – he joined Elveden on March 12, and became case officer: ‘around about August’ last year | ||
A case officer collates evidence gathered by other officers. Laidlaw asks “Are you confident you can deal with questions?” Briddon says yes | ||
DC Briddon has produced spreadsheets. Laidlaw intends to “proceed at some length into the detailed material” | ||
Laidlaw, counsel for Brooks, makes some ‘general propositions’: first article linked to Jordan-Barber from Jan 2004 to August 2011 | ||
Laidlaw points out that during this period Britain was involved in armed conflict throughout this time. | ||
Laidlaw subdivides Jordan-Barber stories in three categories: 1. Deaths in Action. 2. Injuries to Serving Officers 3. Alleged misconduct | ||
Laidlaw comes up with a fourth category dealing with less serious matters in military stories – sexual misconduct, lost property | ||
Laidlaw asks Briddon if he had information from News International suggesting Sun journalist other paid military sources. He says he didn’t | ||
Brooks QC puts before the jury an Operation Elveden document about cash payments by Sun journalist concerned (not named for legal reasons) | ||
DC Briddon says he’s seen this Elveden document before but cannot say he’s analysed for other sources of stories other than Jordan-Barber | ||
28/08/08 Sun Navy story has another cash payment made for £250. | ||
Laidlaw makes another general question about ‘pre-notification’ of army press office by Sun journalist | ||
Laidlaw points out there were two periods Jordan-Barber was on maternity leave in 2004 and 2006 | ||
Laidlaw counsel for Brooks points out Bettina Jordan-Barber left one department on 27/04/09 | ||
Laidlaw asks about stories Jordan-Barber acquired during maternity and when she left secretariat | ||
DC Briddon confirms Jordan-Barber was a friend of Major Alexis Roberts he was alive “Yes, but no way of knowing which story came from where” | ||
DC Briddon explains police only did comparison of Sun exclusive to newsbank articles on 3rd December this year | ||
Stories are sourced from Jordan-Barber during her maternity leave, and call data with Sun journalist from that time. | ||
First Brooks recorded approval for Jordan-Barber payment is an email from late 2006 | ||
Laidlaw is suggesting that DC Briddon missed another article on this Sun/MOD timeline | ||
Laidlaw, Brooks’ counsel, is looking at a story about the deaths of four soldiers on the Shat-al-Arra waterway in Basra in 2006. | ||
The Sun publishes the first article in 2006 about the Basra casualties including a female intelligence officer. | ||
Laidlaw goes through the ministry of defence website document on four soldiers killed on Basra operation in 2006 including Sharon Emlett | ||
Laidlaw goes to an article about bullying in Catterick Barracks in November 2006. | ||
The internal MOD “newsbrief” goes into a recruit who is hospitalised with a blood clot, which may be related to incident at Catterick | ||
Laidlaw, counsel for Brooks, then goes to the court martial of the officer accused of injuring a recruited. DC says sourced to Jordan-Barber | ||
Laidlaw is going through other Sun/MOD stories sourced to Jordan-Barber, the MOD briefings and other news coverage | ||
In 2007 a number of payments april, may to July to Barber Jordan but without apparent authorisation through email, DC confirms | ||
Saunders clarifies with Brooks’ counselthat Telegraph and Birmingham mail article actually followed Sun story published earlier that day | ||
Laidlaw on emails from Sun journalist about Jordan-Barber payments which Brooks doesn’t reply to: he writes to Richard Barun to process | ||
Three payments to Jordan-Barber, paid through Charlotte Hull, were authorised by Richard Barun at the Sun | ||
On Telegraph copying Sun story, Laidlaw explains to jury how other papers steal ‘exclusives’ from first editions of other papers. | ||
On two occasions in 2007, Brooks appears to have been asked twice to approve Jordan-Barber payments; first no reply, second ‘of course’ | ||
In 2008 no recovered response from Brooks to another email from Sun Journo approval of Jordan-Barber payment but executive editor signs off. | ||
Laidlaw establishes that a Sun story Jordan-Barber was paid for seems to have another source paid in cash | ||
Laidlaw summarises 2008: Brooks email three occasions for Jordan-Barber payments. One was not replied to | ||
10 am tomorrow | ||
CORRECTION: live tweets today had two mentions of a Richard Baron – that should be BARUN, a deputy managing editor of the Sun at time |
Note: All the defendants deny all the charges. The trial continues.
Related Articles
8 Lessons From the Murdoch Phone Hacking Trial
News of the World Budget 2005-06: Cutting Mulcaire’s Costs by £70k
Three standout revelations from the first month of the UK phone hacking trial
It’s Personal: The Blair Murdoch War of Words over Wendi Deng
Andy Coulson given sight of the 2000 page Goodman Case in 2006
Previous Posts
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 27 Nov
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 28 Nov
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 5 Dec
Links: The Trial So Far | Full Trial Summary | Indexed Evidence | Breaking News
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 10 Dec | Live Tweeting the hacking trial
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 17 Dec | Live Tweeting the hacking trial
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 11 Dec | Live Tweeting the hacking trial
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 12 Dec | Live Tweeting the hacking trial