Monday 4 November 2013
Summary | ||
The Prosecution Opening Statement continues | ||
A Message from Peter Jukes | ||
Prosecution Counsel Andrew Edis QC | ||
Prosecution Counsel presents evidence for Count 6 – Perverting the Course of Justice | ||
Planning the Sun on Sunday | ||
NI Email Deletion Policy | ||
Removal of Boxes | ||
Prosecution Counsel presents evidence for Count 7 – Perverting the Course of Justice | ||
Where Eagles Dare | ||
The Defence Opening Statement | ||
Counsel for Andy Coulson – Timothy Langdale QC | ||
Prosecution Case Begins | ||
Agreed Facts on Defendants | ||
Timeline – Milly Dowler | ||
Giving evidence – Operation Weeting Detective Sergeant Gregory Smith |
The Prosecution Opening Statement continues | ||
A Message from Peter Jukes | ||
My last day of live tweeting from the Old Bailey: I’ll miss it – my fingers and keyboard won’t #hackingtrial | ||
Look what they did to my keyboard, ma. #hackingtrial pic.twitter.com/BW6ai8u7NJ | ||
Apologies for an obligatory freelance plug for ‘Fall of the House of Murdoch’ giving detail background to the trial http://www.amazon.co.uk/Fall-House-Murdoch-Peter-Jukes/dp/1908717424/ref=ntt_at_ep_dpt_1 … | ||
A short discussion from yesterday about first week of #hackingtrial with @emilybell and @davidfolkenflik on CNN http://youtu.be/1HeWVDBtA7Q | ||
Prosecution Counsel Andrew Edis QC | ||
Andrew Edis QC, counsel for the prosecution, back on his feet in the #hackingtrial | ||
Some sound issues in the annex this morning: but Edis is discussing the two Brooks counts of perverting course of justice #hackingtrial | ||
Sorry folks Edis in inaudible because of a unplugged in cable | ||
The computer has also crashed so a little break while technical difficulties resolved. Normal service resumed shortly | ||
Justice Saunders has let some of into the court because sound not working – so here I am in court 12 | ||
No seats left so I’m typing on my knees #hackingtrial | ||
Edis is showing a correspondence between Brooks in March 2007 to PCC on law breakers being subject to dismissal #hackingtrial | ||
Edis cites July 2009 PCC to CEO designate (Brooks) on “subterfuge by journalists” and new select committee | ||
Edis cites PCC worried about select committee on phone hacking in 09. Wanted assurances from Brooks in July 09 – after @Bynickdavies piece | ||
14/09/09 Brooks’ reply “very similar kind of reply to that to PPC 07… since Goodman… our journalists work within the law” #hackingtrial | ||
“Since Goodman case… no cash payments without approval by senior editors” Brooks to PCC. “Within weeks of Sun payments,” says Edis | ||
“Cash payments must be supported by detailed and relevant information…with confidential sources…ID’s checked against electoral register” | ||
Edis citing Brooks letter on cash payments: “more detail on NOTW but less detail at The Sun” #hackingtrial | ||
Edis: “Perfectly obvious in July 09 the heat was on…. civil litigation, parliament, police review… the temperature was rising” | ||
Edis: “What occurred effectively… the rogue reporter line became more and more untenable” | ||
December 2010 – just before the three first emails were handed to police. Edis shows email from Brooks seeking legal advice | ||
Edis on reply to Brooks: “We’ve spent months moving from rogue reporter to zero tolerance…. by not acting we have to live with damage” | ||
December 2010 – the three emails have been discovered; Edis “A decision was taken to suspend Edmondson… in Jan, Coulson resigned his job” | ||
26th January 2011 – the three damning emails taken to police. “The rogue reporter line abandoned” | ||
Edis “As CEO…. Brooks was involved in the management of the fall out of the phone hacking… ” cites an NI statement | ||
“Follow an exhausting internal investigation….” NI sets up a compensation scheme: “our past behaviour… matter of genuine regret” | ||
‘Our actions then weren’t sufficiently robust” says NI statement in early 2011: “We continue to cooperate fully with Met Police.” | ||
“Police were now fully engaged in trying to investigate the extent of phone hacking…. Mulcaire on books from 2000 to 2006” | ||
“When looking at what Brooks was doing in July 11 you have to see.. there was always a course of justice that could be perveted,” says Edis | ||
5th July 2011 the day Milly Dowler story broke: draft email to staff from Brooks “all appalled and shocked when we heard these allegations” | ||
Edis on Dowler voice mail ‘deletions’ and ‘false hope’ moment alleged in Guardian. No evidence that Mulcaire deleted voicemails | ||
Brooks on 05/07/11 “Since 2006 when MPS seized Mulcaire documentation NI has had not sight of the documents…” | ||
“This morning we have offer Met full co-operation, I’ve also written to Chief Constable of Surrey police…” Brooks email | ||
“It’s almost too horrific to believe that a journalist working for NOTW. (could do this). It is inconceivable I knew…” Brooks in July 11 | ||
Edis: “That is a vigorous denial of any knowledge of Dowler hacking… and an assertion that Brooks would fully cooperate with police” | ||
Prosecution Counsel presents evidence for Count 6 – Perverting the Course of Justice | ||
Edis on coverup allegations: First count concerns 7 archived boxes. | ||
In September 09, on first day as CEO, Brooks’ assistant Cheryl Carter archives Brooks’ journalistic notebooks. | ||
Edis explains “media firestorm that was about to engulf NOTW” in July 11 | ||
Edis goes through phone records between Brooks and her PA Carter on 7th July 11, the day NOTW closure announces | ||
At around 9.30 Carter phone activates a ‘cell site’ at the News International offices according to call data records obtained by police | ||
Edis explains to the jury the science of mobile phone triangulation through masts | ||
Brooks and Carters phone still contact cell sites at Thomas More HQ on July 7th 2011 as NOTW staff are told about closure | ||
The cell site info for the next day, July 8th 11, “a day when significant things happen… Coulson was arrested… Police inquiry moving on” | ||
Five minute break | ||
A rather stop and start beginning to day 6 at the Old Bailey. But Edis is back on his feet | ||
Edis on an email from Brooks to James Murdoch 8th July 11 – which she forwards to her husband Charlie | ||
Edis show “something about her state of mind and thinking… what is proposed a full internal investigation and report” | ||
Edis on Brooks “our internal investigations were woeful…. NOTW closed because of the actions of a few” | ||
Edis on draft email from Brooks to J Murdoch talks about establishing of MSC under leadership of Will Lewis | ||
“Outside counsel will review all previous investigations over the decade…..” End of Brooks internal draft to J Murdoch. | ||
Planning the Sun on Sunday | ||
“I am ring fenced properly… if we don’t launch the Sun on Sunday this weekend…” BREAKING: 8th July 2011 SUN ON SUNDAY already planned | ||
Edis: “plainly at that stage she was planning to carry on as CEO of News International” July 8th 2011 | ||
“8th of July a date of great significance in this case… that was the day Brooks files were delivered to Cherly Carter from NI archives” | ||
Edis: “That was the day Brooks was considering further police investigations and even an internal investigations.” | ||
NI Email Deletion Policy | ||
Edis now talks about NI’s “email deletion policy” #hackingtrial an ‘data retention’ policy is perfectly normal business practice | ||
Edis; “a few documents which display Brooks’ attitude to that policy” Jan 2010 email from Brooks re “email retention policy” | ||
Edis: “to delete emails…. which could be unhelpful in litigation to which NI is a defendant…. from before 31st October 2008” | ||
Edis on Brooks: “launch employee awareness campaign… about potential hazards of email…. a record that can be produced in hard copy.” | ||
Edis: “Exceptions to automatic deletion policy – put it in a folder, litigation (cannot be destroyed no matter how unfortunate they may be) | ||
“However compromising they may be,” emails must be retained when investigations on ongoing in Jan 2010 | ||
Edis on policy in 12 May 2010: Brooks to Chapman (NI Lawyer); “What happens to my emails?” | ||
Chapman replies: “Current proposal all emails prior to December 2007 will be gone forever” | ||
Edis: “That year – 2007 – started with imprisonment with Mulcaire and Goodman” | ||
29th July: Brooks “How come we haven’t done the email deletion policy… Can Andy be consulted.” | ||
More on email deletion policy from Edis: 4th August Brooks “JRM needs help…. anything before January 2010” new date for deletion. | ||
Edis on new deletion date: “This happens to catch her entire period as an editor at News International: | ||
Reply to Brooks: “The revised date is likely to be misconstrued if circulated externally” | ||
NI Lawyer: “Your note mentions Dec 10, this is different from Jan 07 as mentioned on previous note” Brooks: “Yes to Jan 10. Clean Sweep” | ||
Edis: “Of course this is all going on in the context of the Guardian having published its article… and parliamentary inquiry” | ||
Edis: “In fact there had been earlier… and effective… deletions. But no entirely successful because of backups kept by contractors” | ||
Edis: “A great deal of emails were deleted even up to January 2011” | ||
Edis: “That’s all context… now back to Friday 8th of July 2011” #hackingtrial | ||
Removal of Boxes | ||
Edis pulls up a NI record “removal of notebooks and date they were first archived. “ | ||
Edis on description of files in archives: “7 Boxes. All notebooks 1997-2007 of Rebekah Brooks, nee Wade. “ | ||
Edis on official explanation for removal by Cheryl Carter: they were Carter’s not Brooks’ | ||
Edis: “I’d like you to think back to being Brooks’ PA – why would you give it a false description?” | ||
More detail on 8th of July, toward end of afternoon, both Carter and Brooks at work. | ||
Edis: “Who collects the material? Cheryl Carter, NIck Carter (her son) and Gary Keegan (married to Brooks other PA) “people she can trust” | ||
Edis: “The prosecution case is…. these seven boxes have never been seen again.” | ||
Edis: “This is essentially quite a straightforward allegation… but when Carter was interviewed under caution. She said…. | ||
Edis on Carter’s statement to police over the lost 7 boxes 1/They were her boxes and badly labelled. | ||
Edis “the prosecution say this exercised was performed as intelligently as possible…. to set up the account later relayed to police” | ||
Edis on Carter’s statement: 2/ Brooks was not in the office that Friday “setting up a false alibi for Brooks” | ||
Edis: “Just think for a minute of anybody doing that without approval just as NOTW is closed and police investigate.” | ||
Edis: “Do you think that Mrs Brooks didn’t know what her PA was up to or where she was? The false alibi was prepared we suggest.” | ||
Edis says Carter also told police the archivist told her to move the boxes. ‘But this is simply not so” | ||
Edis: “There are a number of falsehoods about these boxes which would be simply unnecessary if this was just a removal” | ||
Edis: “that is all I need to say about that count (count 6) as this stage” | ||
Prosecution Counsel presents evidence for Count 7 – Perverting the Course of Justice | ||
Edis “I’m going to move onto count 7. 15th July Brooks resigns as CEO of NI.” | ||
Edis: “Some of this gets a little involved… 17/07 was a Saturday. This starts on that saturday morning with phone material…” | ||
Edis: “Two days earlier a particular computer was accessing the internet at Jubilee Gdns. The same computer found behind some bins” | ||
Edis: “A cleaner found it… otherwise we’d probably know nothing about it. He told his boss who called the police” | ||
Edis “At this time Brooks and her husband were at the centre of another media firestorm. A security operation was set up by NI” | ||
Edis” Mark Hannah, head of NI, contracted a private security for operation Blackhawk…. looking after the Brooks over weekend” | ||
Edis: “Hanna had lots of people working at NI for him. He also participated,” Edis alleges | ||
Edis on phone call at this time: “Brooks, C Brooks, Hanna and others.” He describes other Blackhawk operatives. | ||
Morning of 17th July, ‘cell site’ information for Brooks et al. Brooks was staying with friends. Security guards with them | ||
Edis says other security operatives, Blackhawk team, were also in Oxfordshire | ||
That morning Brooks went to solicitors Kingsley Napley, followed by a follow counter surveillance car. Brooks knew she was to be arrested | ||
Edis: “She knew she was about to be arrested… and therefore warrants could be issued and her property searched. Brooks knew that.” | ||
Edis shows the cell site data showing the phones now moving around. “the cell site information show phones moving together” | ||
Edis: “The prosecution say there were going to Jubilee Barn to collect things… they didn’t want the police to see.” | ||
Edis: “If they went there at all… it was because Mr and Mrs Brooks wanted them to go there. To collect things before police got there.” | ||
Edis on contracted security team: “Where did they go after Jubilee Barn? Wapping.” Neither were employees of NI | ||
Brooks is driven to Lewisham station, where she was arrested at 12.02. Mr Brooks returns to Chelsea Harbour, CCTV excerpt | ||
Edis: Brooks and his solicitor arrive at London flat around midday. | ||
Edis: “Nothing wrong with having a solicitor present… but it does suggest they knew they would be searched.” | ||
Edis: At 12.15 Charlie Brooks exits lift with Jiffy bag and a laptop. Photo from CCTV | ||
Edis: “He turns to left and goes off camera to where the bins lie. Returns to lift empty handed, looking at his mobile… sending a text?” | ||
Edis: “Two text message sent from Brooks to XXXXXXX” boss of private contractor employed for Blackhawk | ||
Edis: Private contractor then contacts Hanna, who contacts private security guarding Brooks at Lewisham police station | ||
Edis: Hanna contacts C Brooks. Various telephone and text messages exchanges between security staff and NI head of security | ||
Edis: 13.30 Two security operatives leave Wapping… Another Hanna/Brooks call at 14.02. They speak for 13 seconds.” | ||
CCTV: Mark Hanna arrives in Black Range Rover driven from Oxfordshire at Chelsea flat. He has in hand a brown briefcase. | ||
Edis: “Mr Hanna goes off camera in direction of bins. Then comes back… tucked under his left arm looks like Jiffy bag and laptop” | ||
Edis: “Charlie Brooks leaves something… an hour or so later… Mr Hanna goes to these bins and picks up laptop etc and leaves with them” | ||
Edis: “He’s not going to leave them anywhere the police can find them” | ||
Edis: “Hannah and xxx leave Wapping after not very long. You could think they were dropping something off.” | ||
Edis: “Later that day the police search jubilee barn and find no computer or documents or anything of that kind at all.” | ||
Edis: “The coast is clear… the police have finished their search” Text messages between Brooks, Hanna and the Blackhawk team | ||
Edis: “Hanna is contact by Brooks, who then contacts the security team” Some text message have been recovered | ||
Edis exchange of texts around 7pm between Blackhawk team with Hanna’s phone number “Oh I thought I had to call Charlie.” | ||
Edis on Blackhawk texts – Brooks follow car security goes back to Wapping from Lewisham to pick something up. | ||
Edis on telephone contact between Blackhawk one to Hanna, and back to Hanna and Brooks “Hanna was authorising… hiding evidence” | ||
Text at 21.04 text and phone between Hanna and security guard on the way to Thames Quay. To Hanna “Have a plan. Can you call?” | ||
Edis alleges security guard was about to return a bin bag of stuff to London flat – but there’s got to be a pretext. “Get some pizzas” | ||
21.27 Security operative arrives at Thames Quay carpark (Chelsea Flat): he removes black bin bag; “he’s heading off to those bins again!” | ||
Security operative calls Brooks: CCTV shows him on phone in car. “Charlie Brooks is upstairs” And then he leaves | ||
Where Eagles Dare | ||
Two security operatives exchange texts: “Broadsword calling Danny Boy: Pizza delivered and chicken in pot” EAGLES DARE QUOTE | ||
Edis explains Richard Burton’s role in Where Eagles Dare: Answer: “Ha. We should have done a DLB or brush contact on riverside” | ||
Edis explains DLD: “Dead letter drop” A brush contact… But not worth thinking about with a bin bag that size” | ||
Edis: “You can’t log in the hours as perverting the course of justice… so you have to put pizza delivery” | ||
Edis 23.20 Brooks has been at the police station for hours. She’s bailed and driven back to London flat. CCTV covering that. | ||
Next morning 18th July; security operative drives off with Rebekah and Charlie to Kingsley Napp, their solicitors | ||
Edis: “While they’re away Mr Nascimento, a cleaner, finds various items of property near the bins.” | ||
Edis: “At 12.58 the Brooks return to Chelsea Harbour and go to bin area hoping to find bin bag…. but it’s not there. “ | ||
Edis: “Mr Nascimento has taken it to his boss who decides to call the police” | ||
Edis show CCTV Mrs Brooks standing there while two men, Brooks and security bod looking for bag and on phone. | ||
Edis: one security guard calls the other who was supposed to have left bag. They meet outside. | ||
Edis: two more security guards turn up at Thames Quay. CCTV shows another employee arrives. All standing there talking. | ||
Edis: at 14.10; Police arrive at Chelsea harbour. Collect bin bag and brown suitcase from manager of flats | ||
Edis: “Among the contents of bag was postmarked post delivered on the Saturday morning…. Most was Mr Brooks material.” | ||
Edis: “They only brought back what they thought safe to bring back” | ||
Edis: “You only contemplate do this if that was the case…. designed to hide material so police wouldn’t get it. “ | ||
Edis: “They must have been trying to hide something… otherwise they were not behaving rationally. These two computers had no evidence.” | ||
Edis: “All we have to conclude is that this activity was designed to hinder police searches. “ | ||
Break for lunch | ||
I know many journalists have complained about dawn raids during #Weeting #Elveden. Perhaps this morning’s allegations explain context | ||
UNBORKED Soon Edis will close his opening: livetweeting will end. But I will update my blog http://www.fothom.wordpress.com in breaks #hackingtrial | ||
Site Reactivated to Cover Hacking Trial http://wp.me/p1YHIt-2w via @wordpressdotcom | ||
Edis back after lunch: “A piece of evidence slightly interesting….Forensic analysis of a report. “ | ||
Edis refers back to computer in Oxfordshire, then behind bins in Thames Quay | ||
Edis inside computer was a screenshot: it was connected to a particular router. (Edis explains wifi routers) | ||
Edis explains the computer was connected to router was at Jubilee barn (Brooks Oxfordshire residence) | ||
Edis shows screenshot from 26/06/11 a couple of weeks before. On or before that “each of these devices listed here were connected” | ||
Edis identifies a number of other devices on Brooks’ wifi by a number of MAC addresses. | ||
Edis: goes through the devices connected to Jubilee Barn; a number of devices have been found and considered | ||
Edis: But ‘Charlies laptop’ has not been recovered. | ||
Edis: Rebekah’s iphone has not been recovered either | ||
Edis: An Ipad 2 has also NOT been recovered. “We know from an email from Brooks Blackberry… Brooks was using Ipad 2” | ||
Edis: “From that we argue that there are devices (three) that have not been recovered…” | ||
Edis: “It is obvious that the purpose of all this activity was to hide something….” | ||
Edis: “Counts 6 and 7 are different events, but there is a common feature…. and that is Mrs Brooks. We say inconceivable…without consent | ||
Edis: “We say you can put both counts together… for the same purpose of obstructing police investigation” | ||
Edis: “This is long, but outline summary, against these eight defendants. Your job is to scrutinise evidence. That concludes my opening” | ||
BREAKING: I’ve been told we can live tweet from day to day now, depending on evidence. #hackingtrial | ||
Coming up: brief defence opening statement by Timothy Langdale, QC: counsel for Mr Couslon. | ||
The Defence Opening Statement | ||
Counsel for Andy Coulson – Timothy Langdale QC | ||
Langdale on his feet for defence: “It’s relatively uncommon for defense to make opening speech before Jury hears evidence…” | ||
Langdale: “Relatively uncommon though it may be… we think there are good reasons for those who represent Mr Coulson to say something” | ||
Edis: “Don’t worry… I’ll be about 20 mins. We invite you to bear in mind what you’ve heard is just one side of the story.” | ||
Langdale: “This case, as you know, has an unusual history, now being heard in court after years of coverage. We invite you to keep open mind | ||
Langdale: “You draw your own conclusions when you’ve heard ALL the evidence. The prosecution is wrong, conclusions wrong.” | ||
Langdale: “There will be a time to correct all that. Mr Coulson was arrested some 27 months ago. He will in due course give evidence” | ||
Langdale: “He will tell you when he was deputy editor and editor of NOTW (from 2000 to 2007) He recognised something went badly wrong” | ||
Langdale: “He wishes he made some different decisions…. he did not commit these offences. He was never party to an agreement to hack” | ||
Langdale: “You will hear what he made of Goodman’s emails… he did not believe G had paid police. He will explain why.” | ||
Langdale: “At the end…. you’ll understand a great deal more about the editors duties and responsibilities… and what he was doing.” | ||
Langdale: “The hurly burly of production…. it was a fast changing world where a large number of stories were produced and considered” | ||
Langdale: “Large numbers of stories may never cross the editor’s radar. “ | ||
Langdale: “It may be worth thinking of NOTW floor as a ‘story gathering factory’ | ||
Langdale: “The flow of stories was endless and continuing. The world of the Sunday news tabloid, fiercely competitive, pressurised” | ||
Langdale: “The NOTW wasn’t just competing with the other tabloids, but with the Sun” | ||
Langdale: “Within NOTW there was also healthy – and unhealthy – competition. Journos didn’t just wander around discussing sources” | ||
Langdale: “They kept their cards close to their chest, if they didn’t rivals would snatch them. Journos have habit of overinflating sources” | ||
Langdale: “It’s worth bearing in mind all this when considering… number of emails Mr Coulson was copied into” | ||
Langdale: “Prosecution case was that he (Coulson) must have known. But his job was to make sure 3m paper came out on time every Sunday” | ||
Langdale: “Thousand and thousands of stories… and bits of information that didn’t make it into paper. A blizzard of emails for Coulson” | ||
Langdale: On NOTW “wasn’t War and Peace” “Not real or realistic for Coulson to read paper from cover to cover” | ||
Langdale: “That picture ignores the fact there was a constantly changing process during the week… Football for example” | ||
Langdale: “50 pages of football, two magazines… never did the editor read every word of the paper.” | ||
Langdale: “You should focus on meaning of documents when they were produced, rather than with benefit of hindsight” | ||
Langdale: “When it alleged Coulson must have know because News Eds party to hacking… bear in mind Coulson himself was hacked” | ||
Langdale: “Not easy to reconcile with prosecution case – Coulson both conspirator and victim? Things do not sit easily together.” | ||
Langdale on Pre Trial publicity: “One press report had considerable repercussions. Nick Davies in Guardian “wholly unjustified” 4/07 | ||
Langdale now goes back to @Bynickdavies piece: “to eradicate prejudice.” NOTW interfered with police inquiries, deleted messages | ||
Langdale: “there is no evidence to suggest Mulcaire deleted any messages deliberately or accidentally. NOTW very pro police.” | ||
Langdale: “Those statements had a significant impact on the closure of the NOTW. Though Milly’s phone shouldn’t have been hacked.” | ||
Langdale:”It is Mr Coulson assertion that he never was party to the hacking of Milly Dowler‘s phone or anyone else’s” | ||
Langdale closes and now we’re carrying straight on with evidence. | ||
Prosecution Case Begins | ||
Agreed Facts on Defendants | ||
Junior Counsel reads “agreed facts”: Justice Saunders says to count these elements as true and uncontested. | ||
Bryant Heron reads through agreed facts: Mulcaire, late 90s started for NOTW. Instructed by Miskiw on freelance basis. Agreement 2001 | ||
Mark Bryant Heron then goes through the various Mulcaire contracts and payments. | ||
Bryant Heron on agreed facts on Edmondson: career, suspended Sept 2010, dismissed 2011 ‘gross misconduct for hacking’ | ||
Agreed facts on Brooks 89 joined magazine, 91 joined NOTW, 94 deputy feature, 96 deputy, 98 deputy Sun, etc. | ||
Agreed facts on Coulson: as per wiki etc no point retweeting | ||
Agreed facts on Kuttner started 1956, joined NOTW, assistant editor 1980, 1987 Managing editor. | ||
Agreed facts about Kuttner’s physical and mental condition | ||
Agreed facts on Clive Goodman, Cheryl Carter (PA since mid 90s) Charlie Brooks (he’s married that’s all). Mark Hanna. | ||
Other agreed facts: Miskiw, Thurlbeck and Weatherup | ||
Agreed facts on Miskiw’s payments to Mulcaire through Miles Ahead Media: Thurlbeck’s career to Chief Reporter | ||
Weatherup’s agreed facts just detail his career to assistant news editor to Edmondson | ||
Agreed facts on 2006 case: guilty pleas and named victims | ||
Agreed facts Miskiw and Thurlbeck pleaded guilty to count one. Mulcaire guilty to conspiracy on Dowler, Gilchrist, Clarke, Delia Smith | ||
Agreed facts on NI and NOTW: 8th July 09 Guardian article on larger numbers: NYT 2010 alleged more people, and id’ed Thurlbeck | ||
Agreed facts “Missing Milly Dowler‘s Phone was Hacked'” by @Bynickdavies online July 4th | ||
Agreed facts: headline correct, sub heading no evidence to know if voicemails deleted | ||
Agreed definitions of unique voicemail numbers, direct dial messages, pin codes etc. | ||
Timeline – Milly Dowler | ||
Giving evidence – Operation Weeting Detective Sergeant Gregory Smith | ||
Prosecution calls Sergeant Gregory Smith, case officer for Weeting. | ||
Smith: “I was case officer in charge of alleged hacking of Milly Dowler‘s voicemail.” | ||
Smith confirms evidence over Milly Dowler timeline | ||
Smith confirms Kuttner’s contact with Surrey police, as mentioned in opening statements. | ||
Smith confirms Brooks work diaries April 2002 and Missing Milly stories. Now onto phone records | ||
Sergeant Greg Smith confirms Mulcaire notebook entires for Milly Dowler number, credit card payment number from police officer also on it | ||
Sergeant Smith confirms transcripts of Dowler voicemails and notes recovered from Glenn Mulcaire’s computer #hackingtrial | ||
Bryant Heron goes to the top left heading ‘Neville’; “that completes review of Mulcaire notes on the Dowler matter” | ||
Now writing into evidence all the Brooks/NI/Coulson texts and calls during the ‘Missing Milly’ period in 02 when she was in Dubai | ||
Last evidence for the day: Kuttner’s emails to Surrey | ||
Interesting to have the Guardian’s #stopbuggingus NSA debate during #hackingtrial. State and corporate surveillance in the digital age. | ||
Timothy Garton Ash: “We should take our free speech standards from America but our privacy standards from Germany” HT @janinegibson | ||
Worth noting that the kindle version of my book gives a free preview of intro http://www.amazon.co.uk/Fall-House-Murdoch-Peter-Jukes-ebook/dp/B0091US5MU/ref=zg_bs_362569031_4 … #hackingtrial | ||
So, if prosecution are to be believed, Brooks successfully hid 7 boxes of info, iPhone, laptop and iPad from police #hackingtrial Day 6 | ||
Can Twitter successfully bundle content and advertising as newsprint did 150 years ago? http://w.readwrite.com/19vsDui Case not proven yet. | ||
BREAKING: Rebekah Brooks‘ Hollywood Cover-Up Code http://thebea.st/19vIj0L via @thedailybeast | ||
One final thought tonight: from Goodman taping Coulson to Sun journos taping Murdoch and Mockeridge: Fleet Street is a lovely place. |
Note: All the defendants deny all the charges. The trial continues.
Previous Posts
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 30 Oct
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 31 Oct
Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 1 Nov
Links: The Trial So Far | Full Trial Summary | Indexed Evidence | Breaking News
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 5 Nov | Live Tweeting the hacking trial
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 6 Nov | Live Tweeting the hacking trial
Pingback: Hacking Trial Live Tweets – 7 Nov | Live Tweeting the hacking trial